SFGV vs. FGD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SFGV (Sequoia Global Value ETF) and FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) are both Global Equities funds. SFGV is actively managed, while FGD is passively managed. Over the past year, SFGV returned 26.03% vs 32.70% for FGD. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SFGV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FGD.

Performance

SFGV vs. FGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFGV achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly lower than FGD's 16.13% return.

SFGV

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 1.16%
• 6M: 7.57%
• YTD: 13.93%
• 1Y: 26.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.47%

FGD

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 6.03%
• 6M: 9.85%
• YTD: 16.13%
• 1Y: 32.70%
• 3Y*: 22.63%
• 5Y*: 12.38%
• 10Y*: 10.22%
• ALL TIME*: 6.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund	$7.82M	$6.03M	$6.77M
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF	$327.92K	$400.72K	$470.11K

SFGV vs. FGD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF	13.93%	18.84%	11.04%
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund	16.13%	44.42%	8.78%

Correlation

The correlation between SFGV and FGD is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024	0.79

The correlation between SFGV and FGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFGV vs. FGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SFGV	FGD
Financial Services	45.3%	10.4%
Industrials	11.1%	4.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	3.8%
Healthcare	9.2%	-
Technology	6.7%	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	4.7%
Energy	5.6%	0.9%
Basic Materials	3.8%	0.9%
Communication Services	1.5%	1.9%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.9%
Utilities	0.0%	0.9%

Return for Risk

SFGV vs. FGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SFGV

SFGV Risk / Return Rank: 87
SFGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SFGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SFGV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SFGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SFGV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FGD

FGD Risk / Return Rank: 89
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SFGV vs. FGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFGV	FGD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	2.56	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	3.49	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.47	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	3.25	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.70	10.99	+0.71

SFGV vs. FGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFGV and FGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SFGV vs. FGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFGV drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, smaller than the maximum FGD drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFGV and FGD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFGV	FGD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.51%	-68.05%	+53.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-9.82%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.89%	-0.43%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-12.48%	+10.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	2.90%	-0.73%

Volatility

SFGV vs. FGD - Volatility Comparison

Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) at 2.34%. This indicates that SFGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFGV	FGD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	2.34%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.72%	10.00%	-1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.54%	12.49%	-0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.08%	14.85%	-1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.08%	17.91%	-4.83%

SFGV vs. FGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFGV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FGD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFGV vs. FGD - Dividend Comparison

SFGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than FGD's 5.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund	5.03%	5.62%	5.87%	6.44%	5.74%	5.35%	6.17%	5.19%	5.88%	4.01%	4.36%	5.07%
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF	2.34%	2.52%	2.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFGV and FGD in my portfolio?

SFGV and FGD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFGV or FGD?

SFGV has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FGD (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFGV dropped -14.51% vs FGD's -68.05%.

Which ETF is better, SFGV or FGD?

On 1-year performance, FGD leads with 32.70% vs 26.03% for SFGV. On fees, SFGV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SFGV or FGD?

Over the 1-year period, FGD has performed better with a 32.70% return vs 26.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFGV or FGD?

SFGV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFGV or FGD?

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 2.34% for SFGV.

What is the main difference between SFGV and FGD?

They also come from different issuers: Sequoia Financial and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SFGV and 0.55% for FGD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.