PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFGV vs. FEGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFGV vs. FEGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) and First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFGV achieves a 13.41% return, which is significantly higher than FEGE's 8.96% return.


SFGV

1D
0.71%
1M
2.71%
6M
11.36%
YTD
13.41%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FEGE

1D
0.68%
1M
2.06%
6M
6.28%
YTD
8.96%
1Y
24.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFGV vs. FEGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SFGV
Sequoia Global Value ETF
13.41%18.84%0.76%
FEGE
First Eagle Global Equity ETF
8.96%34.19%-1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SFGV and FEGE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.84

The correlation between SFGV and FEGE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFGV vs. FEGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFGV
FEGE

Financial Services

45.9%
11.6%

Industrials

11.1%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
6.5%

Healthcare

9.1%
11.6%

Technology

6.6%
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
14.8%

Energy

5.1%
8.2%

Basic Materials

3.5%
9.0%

Communication Services

1.5%
8.4%

Real Estate

0.2%
3.9%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Financial Services

SFGV
45.9%
FEGE
11.6%

Industrials

SFGV
11.1%
FEGE
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SFGV
10.4%
FEGE
6.5%

Healthcare

SFGV
9.1%
FEGE
11.6%

Technology

SFGV
6.6%
FEGE
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

SFGV
6.6%
FEGE
14.8%

Energy

SFGV
5.1%
FEGE
8.2%

Basic Materials

SFGV
3.5%
FEGE
9.0%

Communication Services

SFGV
1.5%
FEGE
8.4%

Real Estate

SFGV
0.2%
FEGE
3.9%

Utilities

SFGV
0.0%
FEGE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFGV vs. FEGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFGV
SFGV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SFGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFGV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SFGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FEGE
FEGE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FEGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEGE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FEGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEGE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFGV vs. FEGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) and First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFGVFEGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.22

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

7.25

+2.69

SFGV vs. FEGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFGV Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FEGE Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFGV and FEGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFGV vs. FEGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFGV drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, which is greater than FEGE's maximum drawdown of -11.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFGV and FEGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFGVFEGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.51%

-11.13%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-10.96%

+2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.56%

+2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-1.84%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

3.36%

-1.12%

Volatility

SFGV vs. FEGE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) is 3.22%, while First Eagle Global Equity ETF (FEGE) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that SFGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFGVFEGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

4.20%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

10.57%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

12.74%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

14.59%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

14.59%

-1.41%

SFGV vs. FEGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFGV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FEGE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFGV vs. FEGE - Dividend Comparison

SFGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than FEGE's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FEGE
First Eagle Global Equity ETF
1.17%1.28%0.00%
SFGV
Sequoia Global Value ETF
2.35%2.52%2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFGV and FEGE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEGE has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to SFGV (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFGV dropped -14.51% vs FEGE's -11.13%.

On 1-year performance, FEGE leads with 24.26% vs 22.23% for SFGV. On fees, SFGV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, SFGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEGE has performed better with a 24.26% return vs 22.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SFGV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FEGE.

SFGV has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.17% for FEGE.

SFGV is categorized as Global Equities, while FEGE is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sequoia and First Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SFGV and 0.50% for FEGE.

FEGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFGV and FEGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer