SFGV vs. CGCV

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SFGV (Sequoia Global Value ETF) and CGCV (Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFGV is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Sequoia, while CGCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SFGV returned 21.96% vs 15.69% for CGCV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.33% expense ratio.

Performance

SFGV vs. CGCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFGV achieves a 12.68% return, which is significantly higher than CGCV's 9.03% return.

SFGV

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -0.02%
• 6M: 8.56%
• YTD: 12.68%
• 1Y: 21.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGCV

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 2.30%
• 6M: 6.76%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 1Y: 15.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFGV vs. CGCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF	12.68%	18.84%	2.70%
CGCV Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF	9.03%	16.62%	7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SFGV and CGCV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024	0.84

The correlation between SFGV and CGCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFGV vs. CGCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SFGV	CGCV
Financial Services	45.9%	12.1%
Industrials	11.1%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	6.8%
Healthcare	9.1%	12.8%
Technology	6.6%	24.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	10.1%
Energy	5.1%	4.3%
Basic Materials	3.5%	2.8%
Communication Services	1.5%	4.4%
Real Estate	0.2%	1.7%
Utilities	0.0%	7.2%

Return for Risk

SFGV vs. CGCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFGV

SFGV Risk / Return Rank: 72
SFGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SFGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SFGV Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SFGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SFGV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CGCV

CGCV Risk / Return Rank: 57
CGCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CGCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CGCV Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CGCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CGCV Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFGV vs. CGCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFGV	CGCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.60	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.26	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.29	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	1.99	+0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.85	8.01	+1.84

SFGV vs. CGCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFGV Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the CGCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFGV and CGCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SFGV vs. CGCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFGV drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, which is greater than CGCV's maximum drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFGV and CGCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFGV	CGCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.51%	-13.13%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-7.93%	-0.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-0.35%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-1.60%	-0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	1.96%	+0.27%

Volatility

SFGV vs. CGCV - Volatility Comparison

Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) at 2.29%. This indicates that SFGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFGV	CGCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	2.29%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.75%	7.60%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.65%	9.86%	+1.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.15%	12.47%	+0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.15%	12.47%	+0.68%

SFGV vs. CGCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SFGV and CGCV have an expense ratio of 0.33%.

Dividends

SFGV vs. CGCV - Dividend Comparison

SFGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than CGCV's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CGCV Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF	1.45%	1.44%	0.68%
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF	2.37%	2.52%	2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFGV and CGCV in my portfolio?

SFGV and CGCV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFGV or CGCV?

SFGV has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to CGCV (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFGV dropped -14.51% vs CGCV's -13.13%.

Which ETF is better, SFGV or CGCV?

On 1-year performance, SFGV leads with 21.96% vs 15.69% for CGCV. Both ETFs have the same 0.33% expense ratio. On volatility, CGCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SFGV or CGCV?

Over the 1-year period, SFGV has performed better with a 21.96% return vs 15.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFGV or CGCV?

SFGV and CGCV have the same expense ratio: 0.33% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFGV or CGCV?

SFGV has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.45% for CGCV.

What is the main difference between SFGV and CGCV?

SFGV is categorized as Global Equities, while CGCV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sequoia and Capital Group.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.