SETM vs. XES
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES).
SETM and XES are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SETM is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 1, 2023. XES is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. Both SETM and XES are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SETM vs. XES - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SETM vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 14.27% | 95.27% | -13.24% | -11.03% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 42.33% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 0.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SETM achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 42.33% return.
SETM
- 1D
- 5.82%
- 1M
- -14.37%
- YTD
- 14.27%
- 6M
- 33.70%
- 1Y
- 137.98%
- 3Y*
- 26.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XES
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 42.33%
- 6M
- 61.87%
- 1Y
- 65.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- -2.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SETM vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison
SETM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SETM vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank
SETM
XES
SETM vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SETM | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.03 | 1.66 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.18 | 2.11 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.31 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.08 | 2.40 | +2.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.14 | 7.21 | +9.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SETM | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03 | 1.66 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | -0.08 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between SETM and XES is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SETM vs. XES - Dividend Comparison
SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than XES's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 1.37% | 1.56% | 2.07% | 2.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.19% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
SETM vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETM drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETM and XES.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETM | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -95.65% | +52.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.85% | -27.52% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -91.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.74% | -72.51% | +55.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.59% | -54.22% | +39.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.67% | 9.14% | -1.47% |
Volatility
SETM vs. XES - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) has a higher volatility of 18.23% compared to SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) at 7.76%. This indicates that SETM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SETM | XES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.23% | 7.76% | +10.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.72% | 22.14% | +14.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.92% | 40.03% | +5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.22% | 39.84% | -3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.22% | 45.20% | -8.98% |