SETM vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SETM (Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SETM is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SETM returned 25.24%/yr vs 43.23%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SETM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

SETM vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SETM achieves a 13.02% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 86.43% return.

SETM

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -13.85%
• YTD: 13.02%
• 6M: 17.73%
• 1Y: 103.30%
• 3Y*: 25.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLKR

• 1D: 6.28%
• 1M: -2.80%
• YTD: 86.43%
• 6M: 95.63%
• 1Y: 177.77%
• 3Y*: 43.23%
• 5Y*: 16.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SETM vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF	13.02%	95.27%	-13.24%	-11.03%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	86.43%	91.91%	-18.84%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SETM and FLKR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023	0.50

SETM vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SETM	FLKR
Basic Materials	73.2%	2.6%
Energy	25.8%	0.4%
Industrials	0.9%	12.8%
Technology	0.1%	64.3%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	1.5%
Communication Services	-	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.0%
Financial Services	-	7.6%
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

SETM vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SETM

SETM Risk / Return Rank: 72
SETM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
SETM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SETM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
SETM Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SETM Martin Ratio Rank: 72

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 94
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SETM vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SETM	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	4.03	-1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	3.85	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.57	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	7.77	-3.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.22	27.92	-15.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SETM vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SETM Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 4.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SETM and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SETM	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27	4.03	-1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.47	0.00

Drawdowns

SETM vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SETM drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETM and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SETM	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.81%	-50.06%	+7.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.85%	-23.03%	-2.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.81%	-26.39%	-16.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.64%	-14.59%	-3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.26%	-22.06%	+7.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.48%	6.40%	+2.08%

Volatility

SETM vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) is 15.93%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 26.26%. This indicates that SETM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SETM	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.93%	26.26%	-10.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.23%	40.64%	-4.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.85%	44.43%	+1.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.95%	29.12%	+7.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.95%	28.11%	+8.84%

SETM vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SETM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

SETM vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than FLKR's 2.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	2.07%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF	1.38%	1.56%	2.07%	2.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SETM and FLKR in my portfolio?

SETM and FLKR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SETM or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (26.26%) compared to SETM (15.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SETM dropped -42.81% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, SETM or FLKR?

On 3-year performance, FLKR leads with 43.23% vs 25.24% for SETM. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SETM has been the lower-risk option at 15.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SETM or FLKR?

Over the 3-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 43.23% return vs 25.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SETM or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SETM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SETM or FLKR?

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.38% for SETM.

What is the main difference between SETM and FLKR?

SETM is categorized as Energy Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. SETM tracks Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SETM and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.