PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SETM vs. PHYS.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SETM and PHYS.TO is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

SETM vs. PHYS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-9.29%
11.38%
SETM
PHYS.TO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SETM:

-0.40

PHYS.TO:

2.61

Sortino Ratio

SETM:

-0.38

PHYS.TO:

3.26

Omega Ratio

SETM:

0.96

PHYS.TO:

1.46

Calmar Ratio

SETM:

-0.42

PHYS.TO:

4.38

Martin Ratio

SETM:

-0.89

PHYS.TO:

13.62

Ulcer Index

SETM:

14.69%

PHYS.TO:

2.67%

Daily Std Dev

SETM:

32.74%

PHYS.TO:

13.93%

Max Drawdown

SETM:

-30.97%

PHYS.TO:

-27.08%

Current Drawdown

SETM:

-24.71%

PHYS.TO:

-3.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SETM achieves a -11.63% return, which is significantly lower than PHYS.TO's 37.55% return.


SETM

YTD

-11.63%

1M

-11.04%

6M

-8.86%

1Y

-12.68%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PHYS.TO

YTD

37.55%

1M

2.00%

6M

17.35%

1Y

37.03%

5Y*

12.86%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SETM vs. PHYS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SETM, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.271.76
The chart of Sortino ratio for SETM, currently valued at -0.17, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00-0.172.26
The chart of Omega ratio for SETM, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.981.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for SETM, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.292.92
The chart of Martin ratio for SETM, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.618.67
SETM
PHYS.TO

The current SETM Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the PHYS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SETM and PHYS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.27
1.76
SETM
PHYS.TO

Dividends

SETM vs. PHYS.TO - Dividend Comparison

SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, while PHYS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023
SETM
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
2.03%2.48%
PHYS.TO
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SETM vs. PHYS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SETM drawdown since its inception was -30.97%, which is greater than PHYS.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETM and PHYS.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-24.71%
-7.09%
SETM
PHYS.TO

Volatility

SETM vs. PHYS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) at 4.08%. This indicates that SETM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.85%
4.08%
SETM
PHYS.TO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab