SENT vs. EMPB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) and EMPB (Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF) are both Long-Short funds. SENT is passively managed, while EMPB is actively managed. Over the past year, SENT returned 0.00% vs 21.40% for EMPB. SENT charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for EMPB.

Performance

SENT vs. EMPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: —

EMPB

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 5.31%
• YTD: 13.08%
• 6M: 12.18%
• 1Y: 21.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENT vs. EMPB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF	13.08%	14.84%	0.89%

Return for Risk

SENT vs. EMPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMPB

EMPB Risk / Return Rank: 58
EMPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
EMPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
EMPB Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EMPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
EMPB Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENT vs. EMPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SENT	EMPB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	1.73	-1.98

Drawdowns

SENT vs. EMPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENT drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, which is greater than EMPB's maximum drawdown of -7.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENT and EMPB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SENT	EMPB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.34%	-7.55%	-22.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	-5.98%	+5.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.23%	-0.50%	-26.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.89%	-1.50%	-19.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	2.03%	-2.03%

Volatility

SENT vs. EMPB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) is 0.00%, while Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that SENT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SENT	EMPB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	2.57%	-2.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	8.47%	-8.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	11.39%	-11.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.67%	11.83%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	11.83%	+1.49%

SENT vs. EMPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SENT has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EMPB's 1.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

SENT vs. EMPB - Dividend Comparison

SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF	0.78%	0.88%	0.28%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is riskier, SENT or EMPB?

EMPB has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENT dropped -30.34% vs EMPB's -7.55%.

Which ETF is better, SENT or EMPB?

On 1-year performance, EMPB leads with 21.40% vs 0.00% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SENT or EMPB?

Over the 1-year period, EMPB has performed better with a 21.40% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SENT or EMPB?

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.82% for EMPB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SENT or EMPB?

EMPB has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between SENT and EMPB?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Empowered Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SENT and 1.82% for EMPB.