PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMPB vs. HDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMPB vs. HDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) and ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMPB vs. HDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMPB
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF
1.31%14.84%0.89%
HDG
ProShares Hedge Replication
0.49%7.18%-0.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMPB achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than HDG's 0.49% return.


EMPB

1D
2.72%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
1.31%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
16.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDG

1D
1.28%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
0.49%
6M
2.17%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
3.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMPB vs. HDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMPB has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is higher than HDG's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMPB vs. HDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMPB
EMPB Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EMPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMPB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EMPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMPB Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HDG
HDG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMPB vs. HDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) and ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMPBHDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.23

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.03

1.77

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.70

+1.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.07

6.95

+1.12

EMPB vs. HDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the HDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMPB and HDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMPBHDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.23

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.38

+0.71

Correlation

The correlation between EMPB and HDG is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EMPB vs. HDG - Dividend Comparison

EMPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than HDG's 2.49% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMPB
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF
0.87%0.88%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDG
ProShares Hedge Replication
2.49%2.55%3.50%3.48%0.39%0.00%0.08%1.09%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EMPB vs. HDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMPB drawdown since its inception was -7.55%, smaller than the maximum HDG drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMPB and HDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMPBHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-15.31%

+7.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

-4.85%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

-2.74%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-2.80%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.19%

+0.85%

Volatility

EMPB vs. HDG - Volatility Comparison

Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) at 2.61%. This indicates that EMPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMPBHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

2.61%

+3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

4.43%

+5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.21%

6.90%

+5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

7.15%

+5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.26%

7.08%

+5.18%