PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMPB vs. MARB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMPB vs. MARB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMPB achieves a 13.39% return, which is significantly higher than MARB's 0.82% return.


EMPB

1D
0.26%
1M
1.69%
YTD
13.39%
6M
13.34%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MARB

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.04%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
2.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMPB vs. MARB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMPB
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF
13.39%14.84%0.43%
MARB
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.82%7.02%1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between EMPB and MARB is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024

0.03

The correlation between EMPB and MARB shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMPB vs. MARB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMPB
EMPB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
EMPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMPB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EMPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMPB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

MARB
MARB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MARB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MARB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARB Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMPB vs. MARB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMPBMARBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

2.35

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

19.40

-8.91

EMPB vs. MARB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the MARB Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMPB and MARB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMPB vs. MARB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMPB drawdown since its inception was -7.55%, smaller than the maximum MARB drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMPB and MARB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMPBMARBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-11.99%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

-2.43%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-0.60%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-1.39%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

0.29%

+1.74%

Volatility

EMPB vs. MARB - Volatility Comparison

Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) at 0.56%. This indicates that EMPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMPBMARBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

0.56%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.49%

2.17%

+6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

5.29%

+5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.70%

4.26%

+7.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.70%

5.58%

+6.12%

EMPB vs. MARB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMPB has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is lower than MARB's 2.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMPB vs. MARB - Dividend Comparison

EMPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than MARB's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EMPB
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF
0.77%0.88%0.28%0.00%0.00%
MARB
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
2.99%3.01%2.11%2.20%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMPB and MARB have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMPB has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to MARB (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMPB dropped -7.55% vs MARB's -11.99%.

On 1-year performance, EMPB leads with 21.24% vs 5.67% for MARB. On fees, EMPB is cheaper at 1.82% per year. On volatility, MARB has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EMPB has performed better with a 21.24% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMPB is cheaper with a 1.82% expense ratio, compared with 2.30% for MARB.

MARB has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 0.77% for EMPB.

They also come from different issuers: Empowered Funds and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.82% for EMPB and 2.30% for MARB.

EMPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMPB and MARB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer