SELV vs. SPTM
SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SELV is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SELV returned 11.56%/yr vs 22.16%/yr for SPTM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SELV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
SELV vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SELV achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.57% return.
SELV
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 8.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
SELV vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 2.37% | 12.86% | 14.71% | 6.58% | 1.38% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.57% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SELV and SPTM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SELV and SPTM has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SELV vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SELV
SPTM
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
SELV
SPTM
Healthcare
SELV
SPTM
Communication Services
SELV
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
SELV
SPTM
Utilities
SELV
SPTM
Industrials
SELV
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
SELV
SPTM
Financial Services
SELV
SPTM
Energy
SELV
SPTM
Basic Materials
SELV
SPTM
Real Estate
SELV
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SELV vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
SELV
SPTM
SELV vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SELV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.44 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 3.30 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | 15.38 | -11.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SELV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 2.41 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.46 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
SELV vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SELV drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SELV and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SELV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.73% | -54.80% | +41.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.92% | -8.68% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.94% | -18.87% | +9.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -0.25% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -9.05% | +6.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.86% | +0.18% |
Volatility
SELV vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 2.82% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SELV | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 2.82% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.38% | 8.93% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.81% | 11.87% | -3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 16.86% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 18.03% | -6.18% |
SELV vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SELV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SELV vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
SELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than SPTM's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 1.75% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SELV and SPTM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPTM has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to SELV (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SELV dropped -13.73% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 3-year performance, SPTM leads with 22.16% vs 11.56% for SELV. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 22.16% return vs 11.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SELV.
SELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.03% for SPTM.
They also come from different issuers: SEI and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SELV and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SELV and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer