SELV vs. KTEC
SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SELV is a Low Volatility fund actively managed by SEI, while KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index. SELV is actively managed, while KTEC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SELV returned 12.11%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for KTEC. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SELV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.
Performance
SELV vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SELV achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -12.58% return.
SELV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 14.21%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.53%
KTEC
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 10.40%
- 6M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- -12.58%
- 1Y
- -11.77%
- 3Y*
- 0.64%
- 5Y*
- -7.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $941.66K | $1.10M | $1.04M | |
| $608.47K | $511.20K | $528.68K |
SELV vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 6.90% | 12.86% | 14.71% | 6.58% | -0.61% |
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | -12.58% | 21.01% | 16.13% | -10.41% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SELV and KTEC is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.24 |
The correlation between SELV and KTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SELV vs. KTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SELV
KTEC
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SELV
KTEC
Healthcare
SELV
KTEC
Consumer Defensive
SELV
KTEC
-
Communication Services
SELV
KTEC
Financial Services
SELV
KTEC
-
Industrials
SELV
KTEC
Utilities
SELV
KTEC
-
Energy
SELV
KTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
SELV
KTEC
Basic Materials
SELV
KTEC
-
Real Estate
SELV
KTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SELV vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank
SELV
KTEC
SELV vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SELV | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.94 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | -0.38 | +2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | -0.67 | +6.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SELV vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SELV drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SELV and KTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SELV | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.73% | -66.90% | +53.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.92% | -36.49% | +30.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.94% | -36.49% | +27.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -60.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -44.83% | +43.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -44.05% | +41.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 20.47% | -18.26% |
Volatility
SELV vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) is 4.54%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that SELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SELV | KTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 7.27% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.02% | 20.32% | -12.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.86% | 28.20% | -18.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 42.63% | -30.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 42.75% | -30.77% |
SELV vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SELV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SELV vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison
SELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than KTEC's 3.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 3.84% | 3.36% | 0.27% | 0.81% | 0.16% |
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 1.67% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SELV and KTEC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KTEC has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to SELV (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SELV dropped -13.73% vs KTEC's -66.90%.
On 3-year performance, SELV leads with 12.11% vs 0.64% for KTEC. On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SELV has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SELV has performed better with a 12.11% return vs 0.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.
KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 1.67% for SELV.
SELV is categorized as Low Volatility, while KTEC is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: SEI and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SELV and 0.69% for KTEC.
SELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SELV and KTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer