SELV vs. KTEC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SELV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SEI, while KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index. SELV is actively managed, while KTEC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SELV returned 10.32%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for KTEC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SELV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.

Performance

SELV vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SELV achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -21.33% return.

SELV

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -2.81%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.05%
• 1Y: 6.26%
• 3Y*: 10.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KTEC

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: -7.85%
• YTD: -21.33%
• 6M: -21.98%
• 1Y: -19.03%
• 3Y*: 3.17%
• 5Y*: -12.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SELV vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF	0.56%	12.86%	14.71%	6.58%	-0.61%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-21.33%	21.01%	16.13%	-10.41%	0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SELV and KTEC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	0.24

The correlation between SELV and KTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SELV vs. KTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SELV	KTEC
Technology	21.4%	24.5%
Healthcare	17.0%	2.2%
Communication Services	15.8%	28.2%
Consumer Defensive	12.3%	-
Utilities	7.6%	-
Industrials	7.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	45.1%
Financial Services	4.8%	-
Energy	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.8%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

SELV vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SELV

SELV Risk / Return Rank: 21
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 19
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 4
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SELV vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SELV	KTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	-0.69	+1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	-0.88	+1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.90	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	-0.55	+1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.90	-1.08	+3.97

SELV vs. KTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SELV Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the KTEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SELV and KTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SELV vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SELV drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SELV and KTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SELV	KTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.73%	-66.90%	+53.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.92%	-34.76%	+28.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.94%	-34.76%	+25.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.24%	-50.35%	+46.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-43.97%	+41.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	17.67%	-15.50%

Volatility

SELV vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) is 3.23%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that SELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SELV	KTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.23%	8.17%	-4.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.81%	20.90%	-14.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.05%	27.88%	-18.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.90%	43.21%	-31.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.90%	43.05%	-31.15%

SELV vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SELV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

SELV vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison

SELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than KTEC's 4.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	4.26%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF	1.78%	1.74%	1.77%	2.06%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SELV and KTEC in my portfolio?

SELV and KTEC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SELV or KTEC?

KTEC has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to SELV (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SELV dropped -13.73% vs KTEC's -66.90%.

Which ETF is better, SELV or KTEC?

On 3-year performance, SELV leads with 10.32% vs 3.17% for KTEC. On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SELV has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SELV or KTEC?

Over the 3-year period, SELV has performed better with a 10.32% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SELV or KTEC?

SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SELV or KTEC?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 1.78% for SELV.

What is the main difference between SELV and KTEC?

SELV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while KTEC is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: SEI and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SELV and 0.69% for KTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.