PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SELV vs. LGLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SELV vs. LGLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SELV achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than LGLV's 2.78% return.


SELV

1D
1.35%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.05%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
10Y*

LGLV

1D
0.86%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
2.78%
6M
2.23%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SELV vs. LGLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
0.56%12.86%14.71%6.58%-0.61%
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.78%8.37%16.22%9.19%0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SELV and LGLV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022

0.90

The correlation between SELV and LGLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SELV vs. LGLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SELV
LGLV

Technology

21.4%
9.4%

Healthcare

17.0%
7.1%

Communication Services

15.8%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

12.3%
5.8%

Utilities

7.6%
11.6%

Industrials

7.5%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
9.1%

Financial Services

4.8%
9.9%

Energy

4.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

2.8%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.1%
17.6%

Technology

SELV
21.4%
LGLV
9.4%

Healthcare

SELV
17.0%
LGLV
7.1%

Communication Services

SELV
15.8%
LGLV
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

SELV
12.3%
LGLV
5.8%

Utilities

SELV
7.6%
LGLV
11.6%

Industrials

SELV
7.5%
LGLV
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SELV
4.9%
LGLV
9.1%

Financial Services

SELV
4.8%
LGLV
9.9%

Energy

SELV
4.3%
LGLV
3.5%

Basic Materials

SELV
2.8%
LGLV
3.5%

Real Estate

SELV
0.1%
LGLV
17.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SELV vs. LGLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SELV
SELV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

LGLV
LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SELV vs. LGLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SELVLGLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.10

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

0.76

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.90

1.80

+1.10

SELV vs. LGLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SELV Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the LGLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SELV and LGLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SELV vs. LGLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SELV drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum LGLV drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SELV and LGLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SELVLGLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-36.64%

+22.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.92%

-6.86%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.94%

-10.17%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-4.79%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-3.22%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.90%

-0.73%

Volatility

SELV vs. LGLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) is 3.23%, while SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that SELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SELVLGLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

3.51%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.81%

7.00%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.05%

9.57%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.90%

12.94%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.90%

16.07%

-4.17%

SELV vs. LGLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SELV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SELV vs. LGLV - Dividend Comparison

SELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than LGLV's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.09%1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%
SELV
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF
1.78%1.74%1.77%2.06%1.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SELV and LGLV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LGLV has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to SELV (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SELV dropped -13.73% vs LGLV's -36.64%.

On 3-year performance, LGLV leads with 11.54% vs 10.32% for SELV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SELV has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, LGLV has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SELV.

LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.78% for SELV.

SELV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while LGLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: SEI and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SELV and 0.12% for LGLV.

SELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SELV and LGLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer