SELV vs. EELV
SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) and EELV (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SELV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SEI, while EELV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index. SELV is actively managed, while EELV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SELV returned 11.56%/yr vs 10.86%/yr for EELV. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SELV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EELV.
Performance
SELV vs. EELV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SELV achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than EELV's 4.49% return.
SELV
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 8.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EELV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- 4.49%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 14.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.55%
SELV vs. EELV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 2.37% | 12.86% | 14.71% | 6.58% | 1.38% |
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 4.49% | 21.97% | 1.90% | 8.85% | -2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SELV and EELV is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.47 |
The correlation between SELV and EELV shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SELV vs. EELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SELV
EELV
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
SELV
EELV
Healthcare
SELV
EELV
Communication Services
SELV
EELV
Consumer Defensive
SELV
EELV
Utilities
SELV
EELV
Industrials
SELV
EELV
Consumer Cyclical
SELV
EELV
Financial Services
SELV
EELV
Energy
SELV
EELV
Basic Materials
SELV
EELV
Real Estate
SELV
EELV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SELV vs. EELV — Risk / Return Rank
SELV
EELV
SELV vs. EELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SELV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.25 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.79 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | 6.02 | -1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SELV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.35 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.30 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
SELV vs. EELV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SELV drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum EELV drawdown of -36.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SELV and EELV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SELV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.73% | -36.35% | +22.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.92% | -8.22% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.94% | -11.79% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -4.24% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -8.93% | +6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.44% | -0.40% |
Volatility
SELV vs. EELV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) is 2.82%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF (EELV) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that SELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SELV | EELV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 3.39% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.38% | 9.03% | -2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.81% | 10.88% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 11.36% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.85% | 13.64% | -1.79% |
SELV vs. EELV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SELV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EELV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SELV vs. EELV - Dividend Comparison
SELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than EELV's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EELV Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF | 3.58% | 3.75% | 4.70% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 4.35% | 2.82% | 3.14% | 5.50% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.53% |
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 1.75% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SELV and EELV have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EELV has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to SELV (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SELV dropped -13.73% vs EELV's -36.35%.
On 3-year performance, SELV leads with 11.56% vs 10.86% for EELV. On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SELV has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SELV has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EELV.
EELV has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.75% for SELV.
SELV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EELV is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: SEI and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SELV and 0.30% for EELV.
EELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SELV and EELV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer