SELV vs. CDL
SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) and CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SELV is a Low Volatility fund actively managed by SEI, while CDL is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. SELV is actively managed, while CDL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SELV returned 12.82%/yr vs 15.35%/yr for CDL. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SELV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CDL.
Performance
SELV vs. CDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SELV achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly lower than CDL's 17.70% return.
SELV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.55%
CDL
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 1Y
- 22.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $541.63K | $634.09K | $546.81K | |
| $599.62K | $501.58K | $529.11K |
SELV vs. CDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 7.06% | 12.86% | 14.71% | 6.58% | -0.61% |
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 17.70% | 9.04% | 15.58% | 3.03% | -3.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SELV and CDL is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SELV and CDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
SELV vs. CDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SELV
CDL
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
SELV
CDL
Healthcare
SELV
CDL
Consumer Defensive
SELV
CDL
Communication Services
SELV
CDL
Financial Services
SELV
CDL
Industrials
SELV
CDL
Utilities
SELV
CDL
Energy
SELV
CDL
Consumer Cyclical
SELV
CDL
Basic Materials
SELV
CDL
Real Estate
SELV
CDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SELV vs. CDL — Risk / Return Rank
SELV
CDL
SELV vs. CDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SELV | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 4.06 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 14.38 | -7.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SELV vs. CDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SELV drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum CDL drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SELV and CDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SELV | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.73% | -41.03% | +27.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.92% | -5.66% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.94% | -12.87% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -1.91% | +1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -4.29% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 1.59% | +0.62% |
Volatility
SELV vs. CDL - Volatility Comparison
SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) at 3.89%. This indicates that SELV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SELV | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 3.89% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 7.83% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.85% | 10.33% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 13.89% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 17.05% | -5.08% |
SELV vs. CDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SELV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CDL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SELV vs. CDL - Dividend Comparison
SELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than CDL's 3.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.04% | 3.33% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 3.31% | 2.60% | 3.32% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 2.87% | 2.97% | 1.28% |
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF | 1.67% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SELV and CDL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SELV has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to CDL (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SELV dropped -13.73% vs CDL's -41.03%.
On 3-year performance, CDL leads with 15.35% vs 12.82% for SELV. On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CDL has performed better with a 15.35% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CDL.
CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.67% for SELV.
SELV is categorized as Low Volatility, while CDL is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: SEI and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SELV and 0.35% for CDL.
CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SELV and CDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer