SEIV vs. SPYV
SEIV (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEIV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by SEI, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value. SEIV is actively managed, while SPYV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEIV returned 27.80%/yr vs 15.72%/yr for SPYV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEIV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
SEIV vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEIV achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.46% return.
SEIV
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 10.69%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 6M
- 21.23%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 27.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
SEIV vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 18.28% | 27.43% | 19.73% | 21.90% | -3.71% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.46% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | 2.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEIV and SPYV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SEIV and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SEIV vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEIV
SPYV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Financial Services
SEIV
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
SEIV
SPYV
Healthcare
SEIV
SPYV
Technology
SEIV
SPYV
Communication Services
SEIV
SPYV
Basic Materials
SEIV
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
SEIV
SPYV
Industrials
SEIV
SPYV
Utilities
SEIV
SPYV
Real Estate
SEIV
SPYV
Energy
SEIV
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEIV vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
SEIV
SPYV
SEIV vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEIV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.39 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.47 | 3.43 | +3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.41 | 13.16 | +13.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEIV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60 | 2.17 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.42 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
SEIV vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEIV drawdown since its inception was -18.18%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIV and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEIV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.18% | -58.45% | +40.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -6.22% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.71% | -17.54% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -0.57% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -8.72% | +5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 1.62% | +0.08% |
Volatility
SEIV vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 1.98%. This indicates that SEIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEIV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 1.98% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 7.04% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 9.84% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 14.40% | +2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 16.94% | -0.26% |
SEIV vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEIV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SEIV vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
SEIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than SPYV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 1.34% | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.08% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEIV and SPYV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEIV has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to SPYV (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIV dropped -18.18% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 3-year performance, SEIV leads with 27.80% vs 15.72% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 27.80% return vs 15.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SEIV.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.34% for SEIV.
SEIV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: SEI and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIV and 0.04% for SPYV.
SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEIV and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer