SEIV vs. HDV
SEIV (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEIV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by SEI, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. SEIV is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEIV returned 27.80%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for HDV. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SEIV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
SEIV vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEIV achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 12.69% return.
SEIV
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 10.69%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 6M
- 21.23%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 27.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
SEIV vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 18.28% | 27.43% | 19.73% | 21.90% | -3.71% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 1.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEIV and HDV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SEIV and HDV has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SEIV vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEIV
HDV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Financial Services
SEIV
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
SEIV
HDV
Healthcare
SEIV
HDV
Technology
SEIV
HDV
Communication Services
SEIV
HDV
Basic Materials
SEIV
HDV
Consumer Defensive
SEIV
HDV
Industrials
SEIV
HDV
Utilities
SEIV
HDV
Real Estate
SEIV
HDV
-
Energy
SEIV
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEIV vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
SEIV
HDV
SEIV vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEIV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.36 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.47 | 3.95 | +2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.41 | 11.02 | +15.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEIV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60 | 2.10 | +1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.72 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
SEIV vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEIV drawdown since its inception was -18.18%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIV and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEIV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.18% | -37.04% | +18.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -5.18% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.71% | -10.49% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -2.54% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -3.09% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 1.85% | -0.15% |
Volatility
SEIV vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.19%. This indicates that SEIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEIV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 3.19% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 7.56% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 9.73% | +2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 12.82% | +3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 15.73% | +0.95% |
SEIV vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEIV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SEIV vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
SEIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than HDV's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 1.34% | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.08% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEIV and HDV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEIV has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to HDV (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIV dropped -18.18% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 3-year performance, SEIV leads with 27.80% vs 14.94% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 27.80% return vs 14.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SEIV.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.34% for SEIV.
SEIV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: SEI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIV and 0.08% for HDV.
SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEIV and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer