PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIM vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIM vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIM achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 27.02% return.


SEIM

1D
0.47%
1M
-2.14%
6M
12.15%
YTD
15.26%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
26.24%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.51%

PIE

1D
2.51%
1M
-8.10%
6M
16.52%
YTD
27.02%
1Y
43.01%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
5.53%
10Y*
8.76%
ALL TIME*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.45M$4.43M$2.83M
$5.57M$6.94M$5.12M

SEIM vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
15.26%20.20%39.12%16.25%-5.62%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
27.02%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-13.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIM and PIE is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022

0.56

The correlation between SEIM and PIE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SEIM vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEIM
PIE

Technology

29.5%
52.7%

Energy

11.8%
3.7%

Healthcare

9.5%
3.2%

Financial Services

8.1%
14.6%

Basic Materials

8.1%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
1.5%

Real Estate

7.2%
3.5%

Communication Services

4.4%
1.3%

Industrials

3.4%
15.3%

Utilities

2.4%
1.2%

Technology

SEIM
29.5%
PIE
52.7%

Energy

SEIM
11.8%
PIE
3.7%

Healthcare

SEIM
9.5%
PIE
3.2%

Financial Services

SEIM
8.1%
PIE
14.6%

Basic Materials

SEIM
8.1%
PIE
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

SEIM
7.9%
PIE
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SEIM
7.2%
PIE
1.5%

Real Estate

SEIM
7.2%
PIE
3.5%

Communication Services

SEIM
4.4%
PIE
1.3%

Industrials

SEIM
3.4%
PIE
15.3%

Utilities

SEIM
2.4%
PIE
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIM vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEIM
SEIM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SEIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEIM vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEIMPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.53

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

10.20

-1.48

SEIM vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIM and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEIM vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIM drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIM and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIMPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.17%

-72.98%

+50.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-17.26%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.17%

-28.69%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.49%

-13.10%

+7.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-25.91%

+21.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

4.28%

-1.52%

Volatility

SEIM vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) is 6.28%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 12.08%. This indicates that SEIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIMPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

12.08%

-5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.62%

24.13%

-8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.59%

27.09%

-8.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

21.34%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

21.86%

-2.68%

SEIM vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEIM vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

SEIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than PIE's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.90%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
0.55%0.56%0.48%0.89%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEIM and PIE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to SEIM (6.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIM dropped -22.17% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 3-year performance, SEIM leads with 26.24% vs 17.55% for PIE. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIM has been the lower-risk option at 6.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEIM has performed better with a 26.24% return vs 17.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.55% for SEIM.

They also come from different issuers: SEI and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIM and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIM and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer