PortfoliosLab logo
SEIM vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SEIM and BDGS is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

SEIM vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SEIM:

1.02

BDGS:

1.47

Sortino Ratio

SEIM:

1.59

BDGS:

2.35

Omega Ratio

SEIM:

1.23

BDGS:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

SEIM:

1.17

BDGS:

1.86

Martin Ratio

SEIM:

4.05

BDGS:

8.71

Ulcer Index

SEIM:

6.42%

BDGS:

1.95%

Daily Std Dev

SEIM:

23.42%

BDGS:

11.54%

Max Drawdown

SEIM:

-22.17%

BDGS:

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

SEIM:

-3.64%

BDGS:

-0.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIM achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 1.95% return.


SEIM

YTD

2.84%

1M

10.26%

6M

-0.78%

1Y

23.76%

3Y*

15.20%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

1.95%

1M

2.23%

6M

2.77%

1Y

16.84%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

SEIM vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SEIM vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SEIM is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SEIM is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SEIM is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SEIM is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SEIM is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SEIM is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SEIM vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SEIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIM and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SEIM vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

SEIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than BDGS's 1.78% yield.


TTM202420232022
SEIM
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF
0.55%0.48%0.89%1.01%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.78%1.81%0.84%0.00%

Drawdowns

SEIM vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIM drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIM and BDGS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SEIM vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.23%. This indicates that SEIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...