SEI vs. KGC
SEI (Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc) and KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. SEI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while KGC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, SEI returned 53.72%/yr vs 29.09%/yr for KGC. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SEI vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEI achieves a 61.67% return, which is significantly higher than KGC's -8.92% return.
SEI
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -3.95%
- YTD
- 61.67%
- 6M
- 61.32%
- 1Y
- 167.96%
- 3Y*
- 112.03%
- 5Y*
- 53.72%
- 10Y*
- —
KGC
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -18.08%
- YTD
- -8.92%
- 6M
- -8.14%
- 1Y
- 65.63%
- 3Y*
- 76.13%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
SEI vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEI Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc | 61.67% | 62.29% | 277.66% | -15.75% | 57.46% | -15.55% | -38.09% | 19.10% | -43.06% | 75.35% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | -8.92% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 5.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEI and KGC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2017 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
SEI:
$3.66B
KGC:
$30.80B
SEI:
$1.03
KGC:
$2.35
SEI:
72.19
KGC:
10.87
SEI:
4.83
KGC:
3.92
SEI:
4.69
KGC:
3.37
SEI:
$692.11M
KGC:
$7.94B
SEI:
$235.28M
KGC:
$4.19B
SEI:
$249.65M
KGC:
$5.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEI vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
SEI
KGC
SEI vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEI | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.24 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.39 | 1.75 | +4.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.09 | 5.20 | +10.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEI vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEI drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEI and KGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEI | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.49% | -96.00% | +16.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.43% | -37.69% | +11.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.37% | -37.69% | -17.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.37% | -59.29% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | -32.63% | +26.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.61% | -57.60% | +18.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.48% | 12.66% | -2.18% |
Volatility
SEI vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) has a higher volatility of 21.30% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 18.21%. This indicates that SEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEI | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.30% | 18.21% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.09% | 40.59% | +12.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.22% | 51.35% | +21.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.77% | 44.22% | +22.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.28% | 47.01% | +15.27% |
Dividends
SEI vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
SEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than KGC's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.57% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEI Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc | 0.65% | 1.04% | 1.67% | 5.65% | 4.23% | 6.41% | 5.16% | 2.89% | 0.83% |
Financials
SEI vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SEI vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison
SEI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a gross profit of 72.72M and revenue of 196.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.
KGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.
SEI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported an operating income of 50.56M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.
KGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
SEI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a net income of 21.44M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
KGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 831.32M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEI and KGC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEI has higher volatility (21.30%) compared to KGC (18.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEI dropped -79.49% vs KGC's -96.00%.
SEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEI and KGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer