PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEF vs. HDGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEF vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than HDGE's 5.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has outperformed HDGE with an annualized return of -11.50%, while HDGE has yielded a comparatively lower -14.77% annualized return.


SEF

1D
1.10%
1M
1.81%
YTD
8.89%
6M
6.43%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
-10.34%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*
-11.50%

HDGE

1D
2.55%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.59%
1Y
-0.65%
3Y*
-5.06%
5Y*
-2.89%
10Y*
-14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEF vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
8.89%-9.82%-17.81%-8.81%11.85%-27.02%-16.93%-23.51%10.34%-17.12%
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
5.43%1.50%-8.01%-26.98%16.59%-18.61%-43.47%-36.27%7.53%-15.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SEF and HDGE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.74

The correlation between SEF and HDGE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEF vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEF
HDGE

Financial Services

65.0%
-23.5%

Basic Materials

-

-1.3%

Communication Services

-

-3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-18.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-4.9%

Energy

-

-2.5%

Healthcare

-

-3.5%

Industrials

-

-14.1%

Real Estate

-

-9.0%

Technology

-

-26.1%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

SEF
65.0%
HDGE
-23.5%

Basic Materials

SEF

-

HDGE
-1.3%

Communication Services

SEF

-

HDGE
-3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SEF

-

HDGE
-18.6%

Consumer Defensive

SEF

-

HDGE
-4.9%

Energy

SEF

-

HDGE
-2.5%

Healthcare

SEF

-

HDGE
-3.5%

Industrials

SEF

-

HDGE
-14.1%

Real Estate

SEF

-

HDGE
-9.0%

Technology

SEF

-

HDGE
-26.1%

Utilities

SEF

-

HDGE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEF vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEF
SEF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEF Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

HDGE
HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEF vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEFHDGEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.26

-0.04

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

0.08

+0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.01

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

-0.05

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.73

-0.11

+0.83

SEF vs. HDGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the HDGE Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEF and HDGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEFHDGEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

-0.04

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

-0.12

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.56

-0.63

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

-0.67

+0.19

Drawdowns

SEF vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, roughly equal to the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and HDGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEFHDGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.51%

-93.88%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-12.26%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.40%

-29.46%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

-42.97%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

-83.69%

+8.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.09%

-93.08%

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.72%

-70.11%

-12.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

6.16%

-1.02%

Volatility

SEF vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 3.01%, while AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEFHDGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

6.41%

-3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

12.81%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

18.33%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.96%

24.18%

-6.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

23.56%

-3.04%

SEF vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEF vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison

SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, which matches HDGE's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
3.32%3.50%7.83%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%0.00%
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
3.35%4.33%5.72%4.43%0.39%0.00%0.12%1.25%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEF and HDGE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDGE has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs HDGE's -93.88%.

On 10-year performance, SEF leads with -11.50% vs -14.77% for HDGE. On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SEF has performed better with a -11.50% return vs -14.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 3.32% for HDGE.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 3.36% for HDGE.

SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEF and HDGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer