SEF vs. BERZ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ).
SEF and BERZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SEF is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). It was launched on Jun 12, 2008. BERZ is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation Index. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021. Both SEF and BERZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SEF vs. BERZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEF vs. BERZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 11.27% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -6.34% |
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 19.74% | -78.81% | -65.95% | -89.12% | 102.85% | -30.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than BERZ's 19.74% return.
SEF
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 2.76%
- 3Y*
- -10.01%
- 5Y*
- -6.70%
- 10Y*
- -11.67%
BERZ
- 1D
- -14.87%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 6M
- -4.91%
- 1Y
- -79.02%
- 3Y*
- -70.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEF vs. BERZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SEF and BERZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. BERZ — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
BERZ
SEF vs. BERZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEF | BERZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | -0.84 | +0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.36 | -1.52 | +1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.81 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | -0.88 | +0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | -1.00 | +1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEF | BERZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | -0.84 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | -0.66 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and BERZ is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SEF vs. BERZ - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, while BERZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.27% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SEF vs. BERZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, roughly equal to the maximum BERZ drawdown of -99.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and BERZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | BERZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -99.46% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -89.01% | +68.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.00% | -99.28% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.58% | -70.50% | -12.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.44% | 78.74% | -64.30% |
Volatility
SEF vs. BERZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 4.86%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a volatility of 29.36%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BERZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | BERZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 29.36% | -24.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.37% | 61.12% | -49.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.28% | 94.14% | -74.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 92.55% | -74.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 92.55% | -72.00% |