PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BERZ vs. SOXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BERZ vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BERZ achieves a -60.32% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -94.69% return.


BERZ

1D
2.65%
1M
-6.29%
YTD
-60.32%
6M
-58.94%
1Y
-83.28%
3Y*
-75.61%
5Y*
10Y*

SOXS

1D
-8.08%
1M
-57.31%
YTD
-94.69%
6M
-94.57%
1Y
-98.20%
3Y*
-88.23%
5Y*
-81.24%
10Y*
-79.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BERZ vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BERZ
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
-60.32%-78.81%-65.95%-89.12%102.85%-28.36%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
-94.69%-85.53%-59.55%-84.56%15.76%-53.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BERZ and SOXS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021

0.86

The correlation between BERZ and SOXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BERZ vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BERZ
BERZ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BERZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BERZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BERZ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BERZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BERZ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXS
SOXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SOXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BERZ vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BERZSOXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

0.61

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

-1.00

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.54

-1.46

-0.08

BERZ vs. SOXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BERZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is comparable to the SOXS Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BERZ and SOXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BERZ vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BERZ drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERZ and SOXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BERZSOXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.80%

-100.00%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.55%

-98.17%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.87%

-99.87%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.76%

-100.00%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.79%

-92.60%

+20.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.40%

67.64%

-12.24%

Volatility

BERZ vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) is 32.14%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 61.89%. This indicates that BERZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BERZSOXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.14%

61.89%

-29.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.10%

97.94%

-34.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.60%

115.12%

-34.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.68%

110.92%

-18.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.68%

101.99%

-9.31%

BERZ vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BERZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

BERZ vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison

BERZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BERZ
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
101.68%10.79%5.45%9.22%0.19%0.00%3.58%2.30%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


BERZ and SOXS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXS has higher volatility (61.89%) compared to BERZ (32.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERZ dropped -99.80% vs SOXS's -100.00%.

On 3-year performance, BERZ leads with -75.61% vs -88.23% for SOXS. On fees, BERZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BERZ has been the lower-risk option at 32.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BERZ has performed better with a -75.61% return vs -88.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BERZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.

SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 101.68%, compared with 0.00% for BERZ.

BERZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation Index, while SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BERZ and 1.08% for SOXS.

SOXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.85 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BERZ and SOXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer