BERZ vs. QUS
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS).
BERZ and QUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BERZ is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation Index. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021. QUS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). It was launched on Apr 16, 2015. Both BERZ and QUS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BERZ vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BERZ vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 13.44% | -78.81% | -65.95% | -89.12% | 102.85% | -30.19% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | -1.11% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 7.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BERZ achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's -1.11% return.
BERZ
- 1D
- -5.26%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 13.44%
- 6M
- -5.13%
- 1Y
- -79.58%
- 3Y*
- -71.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BERZ vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BERZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BERZ vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
BERZ
QUS
BERZ vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BERZ | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | 0.81 | -1.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | 1.23 | -2.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.18 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 1.11 | -2.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 5.43 | -6.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BERZ | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | 0.81 | -1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 0.73 | -1.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between BERZ and QUS is -0.75. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BERZ vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
BERZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.40% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
BERZ vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BERZ drawdown since its inception was -99.46%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERZ and QUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BERZ | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.46% | -33.78% | -65.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.01% | -10.42% | -78.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.32% | -4.68% | -94.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.53% | -3.75% | -66.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 78.92% | 2.13% | +76.79% |
Volatility
BERZ vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a higher volatility of 29.72% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 3.78%. This indicates that BERZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BERZ | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.72% | 3.78% | +25.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.36% | 7.13% | +54.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.24% | 14.48% | +79.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.54% | 14.37% | +78.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.54% | 16.41% | +76.13% |