BERZ vs. FNGD
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD).
BERZ and FNGD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BERZ is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation Index. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021. FNGD is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. Both BERZ and FNGD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BERZ vs. FNGD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BERZ vs. FNGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 19.74% | -78.81% | -65.95% | -89.12% | 102.85% | -30.19% |
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 40.23% | -61.42% | -76.57% | -90.14% | 52.21% | -31.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BERZ achieves a 19.74% return, which is significantly lower than FNGD's 40.23% return.
BERZ
- 1D
- -14.87%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 6M
- -4.91%
- 1Y
- -79.02%
- 3Y*
- -70.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGD
- 1D
- -13.84%
- 1M
- 10.30%
- YTD
- 40.23%
- 6M
- 44.34%
- 1Y
- -59.51%
- 3Y*
- -65.85%
- 5Y*
- -59.96%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BERZ vs. FNGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BERZ and FNGD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
BERZ vs. FNGD — Risk / Return Rank
BERZ
FNGD
BERZ vs. FNGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BERZ | FNGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | -0.76 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | -0.93 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.87 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.72 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | -0.82 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BERZ | FNGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | -0.76 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | -0.75 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between BERZ and FNGD is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BERZ vs. FNGD - Dividend Comparison
Neither BERZ nor FNGD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BERZ vs. FNGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BERZ drawdown since its inception was -99.46%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGD drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERZ and FNGD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BERZ | FNGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.46% | -100.00% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.01% | -82.53% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.28% | -99.99% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.50% | -86.98% | +16.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 78.74% | 71.84% | +6.90% |
Volatility
BERZ vs. FNGD - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a higher volatility of 29.36% compared to MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) at 24.51%. This indicates that BERZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BERZ | FNGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.36% | 24.51% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.12% | 45.21% | +15.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.14% | 78.65% | +15.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.55% | 88.85% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.55% | 91.51% | +1.04% |