BERZ vs. FNGD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BERZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - BERZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive FANG Innovation Index, while FNGD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BERZ returned -71.80%/yr vs -64.85%/yr for FNGD. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

BERZ vs. FNGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BERZ achieves a -51.36% return, which is significantly lower than FNGD's -34.80% return.

BERZ

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: 9.10%
• 6M: -50.40%
• YTD: -51.36%
• 1Y: -76.10%
• 3Y*: -71.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -64.98%

FNGD

• 1D: -5.03%
• 1M: -4.69%
• 6M: -39.93%
• YTD: -34.80%
• 1Y: -48.33%
• 3Y*: -64.85%
• 5Y*: -63.24%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -69.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	$2.17M	$1.82M	$2.17M
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	$13.50M	$14.88M	$20.27M

BERZ vs. FNGD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BERZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-51.36%	-78.81%	-65.95%	-89.12%	102.85%	-28.36%
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-34.80%	-61.42%	-76.57%	-90.14%	52.21%	-30.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BERZ and FNGD is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021	0.92

The correlation between BERZ and FNGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BERZ vs. FNGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BERZ	FNGD
Technology	65.0%	59.6%
Communication Services	20.9%	30.0%
Consumer Cyclical	14.2%	10.4%
Financial Services	13.3%	10.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BERZ vs. FNGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BERZ

BERZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
BERZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BERZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BERZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BERZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BERZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FNGD

FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 4
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BERZ vs. FNGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BERZ	FNGD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	-0.67	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.52	-0.76	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	0.91	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	-0.68	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	-1.26	-0.06

BERZ vs. FNGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BERZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is comparable to the FNGD Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BERZ and FNGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BERZ vs. FNGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BERZ drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGD drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BERZ and FNGD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BERZ	FNGD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.80%	-100.00%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-83.72%	-65.92%	-17.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.87%	-97.35%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.71%	-100.00%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.42%	-87.46%	+15.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.70%	35.26%	+20.44%

Volatility

BERZ vs. FNGD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (BERZ) has a higher volatility of 33.28% compared to MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) at 18.15%. This indicates that BERZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BERZ	FNGD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.28%	18.15%	+15.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.82%	54.65%	+16.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.12%	66.81%	+20.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.03%	89.78%	+3.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.03%	90.95%	+2.08%

BERZ vs. FNGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BERZ and FNGD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

BERZ vs. FNGD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BERZ nor FNGD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BERZ and FNGD in my portfolio?

BERZ and FNGD have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BERZ or FNGD?

BERZ has higher volatility (33.28%) compared to FNGD (18.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BERZ dropped -99.80% vs FNGD's -100.00%.

Which ETF is better, BERZ or FNGD?

On 3-year performance, FNGD leads with -64.85% vs -71.80% for BERZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, FNGD has been the lower-risk option at 18.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BERZ or FNGD?

Over the 3-year period, FNGD has performed better with a -64.85% return vs -71.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BERZ or FNGD?

BERZ and FNGD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BERZ or FNGD?

BERZ and FNGD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BERZ and FNGD?

BERZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FNGD is Leveraged Equities. BERZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation Index, while FNGD tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.