SEEFX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund (SEEFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
SEEFX is managed by Saturna Sustainable Funds. It was launched on Mar 26, 2015. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
SEEFX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEEFX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEEFX Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund | -6.40% | 18.55% | 9.61% | 18.83% | -21.41% | 11.29% | 24.39% | 30.96% | -5.76% | 23.76% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEEFX achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, SEEFX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 9.33%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
SEEFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -10.30%
- YTD
- -6.40%
- 6M
- -4.83%
- 1Y
- 15.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEEFX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEEFX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SEEFX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
SEEFX
FGIAX
SEEFX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund (SEEFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEEFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 1.75 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 2.26 | -1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.35 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 2.61 | -1.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 12.12 | -8.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEEFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.75 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.80 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.58 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.42 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEEFX and FGIAX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SEEFX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
SEEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.42%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEEFX Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund | 38.42% | 0.98% | 0.49% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 0.62% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.89% | 0.77% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
SEEFX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEEFX drawdown since its inception was -30.25%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEEFX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEEFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.25% | -49.35% | +19.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -8.29% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.25% | -21.08% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.25% | -38.02% | +7.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.02% | -3.78% | -7.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -7.22% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 1.78% | +1.15% |
Volatility
SEEFX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund (SEEFX) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that SEEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEEFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 4.05% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 7.09% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 12.28% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.25% | 13.08% | +2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 15.17% | +0.38% |