SECT vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SECT (Main Sector Rotation ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SECT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Main, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. SECT is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SECT returned 12.13%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SECT charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

SECT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECT achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.11% return.

SECT

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: 9.46%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 1Y: 23.38%
• 3Y*: 18.31%
• 5Y*: 12.13%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.46%

SCHG

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 2.17%
• 6M: 8.95%
• YTD: 7.11%
• 1Y: 18.50%
• 3Y*: 23.37%
• 5Y*: 13.47%
• 10Y*: 18.33%
• ALL TIME*: 16.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$249.58M	$250.01M	$339.80M
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF	$7.17M	$6.89M	$6.82M

SECT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF	10.61%	17.80%	18.61%	21.10%	-12.80%	28.88%	15.65%	28.06%	-9.66%	9.39%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	7.11%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	9.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SECT and SCHG is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017	0.86

The correlation between SECT and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

SECT vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SECT	SCHG
Technology	44.8%	44.0%
Financial Services	18.0%	7.7%
Industrials	12.0%	7.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	11.2%
Utilities	6.2%	0.5%
Energy	3.6%	0.9%
Basic Materials	3.4%	1.6%
Communication Services	1.2%	14.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	1.9%
Healthcare	0.2%	9.9%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.6%

Return for Risk

SECT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SECT

SECT Risk / Return Rank: 65
SECT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SECT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SECT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SECT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SECT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SECT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SECT	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.12	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	1.59	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.20	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	1.13	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.53	3.58	+4.96

SECT vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECT Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECT and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SECT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECT drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECT and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SECT	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.09%	-34.59%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.71%	-16.41%	+5.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.71%	-23.39%	+1.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.71%	-34.59%	+12.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-1.15%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-5.19%	+0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	5.19%	-2.44%

Volatility

SECT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 4.75% and 4.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SECT	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	4.76%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.81%	13.02%	-1.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	16.66%	-2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.02%	22.45%	-4.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.12%	21.60%	-1.48%

SECT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECT has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

SECT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SECT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF	0.73%	0.32%	0.45%	0.84%	0.86%	0.60%	1.37%	0.77%	1.67%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SECT and SCHG in my portfolio?

SECT and SCHG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SECT or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SECT (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECT dropped -38.09% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, SECT or SCHG?

On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 13.47% vs 12.13% for SECT. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SECT or SCHG?

Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 12.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SECT or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for SECT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SECT or SCHG?

SECT has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between SECT and SCHG?

SECT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Main and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for SECT and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SECT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.