SECT vs. AESR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SECT (Main Sector Rotation ETF) and AESR (Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SECT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Main Management, while AESR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SECT returned 12.30%/yr vs 14.75%/yr for AESR. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SECT charges 0.78%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for AESR.

Performance

SECT vs. AESR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECT achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly lower than AESR's 20.10% return.

SECT

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 25.45%
• 3Y*: 19.92%
• 5Y*: 12.30%
• 10Y*: —

AESR

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 20.10%
• 6M: 17.96%
• 1Y: 34.03%
• 3Y*: 26.13%
• 5Y*: 14.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECT vs. AESR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF	10.57%	17.80%	18.61%	21.10%	-12.80%	28.88%	15.65%	0.28%
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF	20.10%	20.34%	25.37%	21.03%	-17.52%	25.26%	19.58%	0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SECT and AESR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019	0.91

The correlation between SECT and AESR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SECT vs. AESR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SECT	AESR
Technology	45.7%	40.4%
Financial Services	17.3%	6.7%
Industrials	11.3%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	12.3%
Utilities	6.0%	0.3%
Energy	3.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	3.5%	1.2%
Communication Services	1.4%	24.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	2.2%
Healthcare	0.2%	2.0%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.3%

Return for Risk

SECT vs. AESR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECT

SECT Risk / Return Rank: 61
SECT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SECT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
SECT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
SECT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SECT Martin Ratio Rank: 62

AESR

AESR Risk / Return Rank: 70
AESR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
AESR Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
AESR Omega Ratio Rank: 65
AESR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
AESR Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECT vs. AESR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SECT	AESR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.89	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.50	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.34	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	3.48	-1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.63	14.06	-4.42

SECT vs. AESR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECT Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the AESR Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECT and AESR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SECT vs. AESR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECT drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than AESR's maximum drawdown of -31.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECT and AESR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SECT	AESR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.09%	-31.06%	-7.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.71%	-9.82%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.71%	-19.85%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.71%	-25.04%	+3.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.67%	-2.16%	+0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.64%	-5.98%	+1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	2.43%	+0.22%

Volatility

SECT vs. AESR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) is 6.27%, while Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that SECT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AESR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SECT	AESR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.27%	8.93%	-2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.08%	15.07%	-3.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.92%	18.14%	-4.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.96%	18.22%	-0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.16%	20.62%	-0.46%

SECT vs. AESR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECT has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than AESR's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

SECT vs. AESR - Dividend Comparison

SECT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than AESR's 19.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF	19.16%	23.02%	0.17%	0.33%	0.73%	6.59%	1.06%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF	0.73%	0.32%	0.45%	0.84%	0.86%	0.60%	1.37%	0.77%	1.67%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SECT and AESR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, SECT and AESR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SECT or AESR?

AESR has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to SECT (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECT dropped -38.09% vs AESR's -31.06%.

Which ETF is better, SECT or AESR?

On 5-year performance, AESR leads with 14.75% vs 12.30% for SECT. On fees, SECT is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, SECT has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SECT or AESR?

Over the 5-year period, AESR has performed better with a 14.75% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SECT or AESR?

SECT is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SECT or AESR?

AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.16%, compared with 0.73% for SECT.

What is the main difference between SECT and AESR?

SECT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AESR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Main Management and Regents Park Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for SECT and 1.46% for AESR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AESR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.