SECT vs. QPX
SECT (Main Sector Rotation ETF) and QPX (AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SECT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Main Management, while QPX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SECT returned 12.27%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for QPX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SECT charges 0.78%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for QPX.
Performance
SECT vs. QPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECT achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly higher than QPX's 7.30% return.
SECT
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- —
QPX
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 26.59%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- —
SECT vs. QPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF | 9.97% | 17.80% | 18.61% | 21.10% | -12.80% | 28.88% | 0.06% |
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 7.30% | 24.12% | 17.28% | 44.63% | -30.90% | 22.29% | -0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SECT and QPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SECT and QPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SECT vs. QPX — Risk / Return Rank
SECT
QPX
SECT vs. QPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SECT | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.31 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 2.31 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 8.92 | +1.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SECT vs. QPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECT drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than QPX's maximum drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECT and QPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECT | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.09% | -34.74% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -11.56% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.71% | -17.89% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.71% | -34.74% | +13.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -3.86% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -8.02% | +3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.99% | -0.35% |
Volatility
SECT vs. QPX - Volatility Comparison
Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF (QPX) have volatilities of 6.36% and 6.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SECT | QPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 6.59% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.10% | 12.42% | -1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.03% | 15.13% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 20.09% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 20.07% | +0.10% |
SECT vs. QPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECT has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than QPX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
SECT vs. QPX - Dividend Comparison
SECT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while QPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPX AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SECT Main Sector Rotation ETF | 0.61% | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.84% | 0.86% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 0.77% | 1.67% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SECT and QPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QPX has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to SECT (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECT dropped -38.09% vs QPX's -34.74%.
On 5-year performance, SECT leads with 12.27% vs 11.40% for QPX. On fees, SECT is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, SECT has been the lower-risk option at 6.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SECT has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SECT is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for QPX.
SECT has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for QPX.
SECT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QPX is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Main Management and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for SECT and 1.46% for QPX.
SECT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SECT and QPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer