SECIX vs. GILHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX).
SECIX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Aug 7, 1944. GILHX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Dec 16, 2013.
Performance
SECIX vs. GILHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SECIX vs. GILHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECIX Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund | -3.42% | 13.92% | 3.94% | 9.03% | -1.58% | 27.12% | 2.60% | 21.44% | -10.05% | 15.33% |
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | -0.13% | 6.02% | 6.00% | 7.28% | -4.90% | 0.00% | 6.51% | 2.21% | 1.66% | 2.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECIX achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly lower than GILHX's -0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, SECIX has outperformed GILHX with an annualized return of 8.96%, while GILHX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.11% annualized return.
SECIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.47%
- YTD
- -3.42%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 9.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
GILHX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.57%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- 3.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SECIX vs. GILHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GILHX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SECIX vs. GILHX — Risk / Return Rank
SECIX
GILHX
SECIX vs. GILHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) and Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SECIX | GILHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 2.41 | -1.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 4.62 | -3.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.59 | -0.44 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 4.15 | -3.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 16.72 | -13.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SECIX | GILHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 2.41 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 1.33 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 1.71 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 1.66 | -1.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between SECIX and GILHX is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SECIX vs. GILHX - Dividend Comparison
SECIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.08%, more than GILHX's 4.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SECIX Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund | 15.08% | 14.56% | 3.80% | 12.08% | 9.42% | 6.96% | 7.12% | 7.69% | 6.34% | 8.25% | 3.23% | 8.36% |
GILHX Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund | 4.15% | 4.43% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 2.05% | 1.79% | 2.25% | 2.31% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 3.07% | 3.54% |
Drawdowns
SECIX vs. GILHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECIX drawdown since its inception was -62.58%, which is greater than GILHX's maximum drawdown of -8.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECIX and GILHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECIX | GILHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.58% | -8.10% | -54.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -1.13% | -10.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.37% | -8.10% | -15.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.54% | -8.10% | -30.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -0.93% | -5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.55% | -0.71% | -15.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 0.28% | +2.18% |
Volatility
SECIX vs. GILHX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund (GILHX) at 0.53%. This indicates that SECIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GILHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SECIX | GILHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 0.53% | +2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.62% | 1.18% | +6.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.44% | 1.91% | +13.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 2.20% | +14.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 1.83% | +16.80% |