SEBLX vs. PALDX
SEBLX (Touchstone Balanced Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, SEBLX returned 6.88%/yr vs 9.50%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEBLX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.
Performance
SEBLX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEBLX achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.89% return.
SEBLX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 16.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
PALDX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- —
SEBLX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEBLX Touchstone Balanced Fund | 3.86% | 13.59% | 13.08% | 18.17% | -16.16% | 13.95% | 18.74% | 39.05% | -2.74% | 5.52% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 7.89% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEBLX and PALDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SEBLX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEBLX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
SEBLX
PALDX
SEBLX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Balanced Fund (SEBLX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEBLX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.04 | 2.76 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | 3.95 | -1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.52 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.65 | -1.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 17.34 | -8.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEBLX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 2.76 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.79 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.81 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SEBLX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEBLX drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEBLX and PALDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEBLX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.70% | -26.16% | -10.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -5.96% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.60% | -16.06% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.47% | -20.47% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -4.09% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.25% | +0.67% |
Volatility
SEBLX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Balanced Fund (SEBLX) is 2.11%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 2.29%. This indicates that SEBLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEBLX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | 2.29% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.44% | 6.19% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.25% | 7.91% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.24% | 12.11% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 12.70% | -0.51% |
SEBLX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEBLX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEBLX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
SEBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than PALDX's 5.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.02% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEBLX Touchstone Balanced Fund | 4.84% | 5.03% | 1.83% | 1.26% | 0.99% | 2.74% | 7.72% | 24.06% | 7.04% | 6.00% | 1.98% | 5.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SEBLX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PALDX has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to SEBLX (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEBLX dropped -36.70% vs PALDX's -26.16%.
PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEBLX and PALDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer