SEA vs. JETS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SEA (U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF) and JETS (U.S. Global Jets ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds from US Global - SEA tracks the U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross while JETS tracks the U.S. Global Jets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEA returned 18.52%/yr vs 14.30%/yr for JETS. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

SEA vs. JETS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEA achieves a 20.79% return, which is significantly higher than JETS's -0.86% return.

SEA

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 20.79%
• 6M: 21.12%
• 1Y: 30.09%
• 3Y*: 18.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JETS

• 1D: -2.35%
• 1M: 9.48%
• YTD: -0.86%
• 6M: 3.46%
• 1Y: 22.85%
• 3Y*: 14.30%
• 5Y*: 1.37%
• 10Y*: 2.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEA vs. JETS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	20.79%	16.78%	2.52%	19.33%	-17.28%
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF	-0.86%	11.64%	33.21%	11.42%	-20.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SEA and JETS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2022	0.44

SEA vs. JETS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEA	JETS
Industrials	82.7%	88.8%
Energy	17.3%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-
Technology	-1.6%	2.6%

Return for Risk

SEA vs. JETS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEA

SEA Risk / Return Rank: 56
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

JETS

JETS Risk / Return Rank: 21
JETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
JETS Omega Ratio Rank: 21
JETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
JETS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEA vs. JETS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEA	JETS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	0.70	+1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	1.27	+1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.14	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	0.95	+1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.52	2.44	+9.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEA vs. JETS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the JETS Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEA and JETS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEA	JETS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	0.70	+1.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.05	+0.34

Drawdowns

SEA vs. JETS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEA drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, smaller than the maximum JETS drawdown of -64.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA and JETS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEA	JETS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.53%	-64.92%	+25.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-24.13%	+13.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.42%	-35.21%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.07%	-17.40%	+14.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.31%	-25.19%	+10.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	9.40%	-6.78%

Volatility

SEA vs. JETS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) is 5.17%, while U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a volatility of 11.74%. This indicates that SEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JETS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEA	JETS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	11.74%	-6.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.01%	24.23%	-12.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.28%	32.61%	-16.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.67%	32.27%	-10.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.67%	34.18%	-12.51%

SEA vs. JETS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SEA and JETS have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

SEA vs. JETS - Dividend Comparison

SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than JETS's 0.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF	0.84%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	0.04%	1.24%	0.09%	1.57%	0.58%	0.17%
SEA U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF	5.59%	6.76%	18.47%	9.85%	18.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEA and JETS in my portfolio?

SEA and JETS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEA or JETS?

JETS has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to SEA (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEA dropped -39.53% vs JETS's -64.92%.

Which ETF is better, SEA or JETS?

On 3-year performance, SEA leads with 18.52% vs 14.30% for JETS. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, SEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEA or JETS?

Over the 3-year period, SEA has performed better with a 18.52% return vs 14.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEA or JETS?

SEA and JETS have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEA or JETS?

SEA has the higher dividend yield at 5.59%, compared with 0.84% for JETS.

What is the main difference between SEA and JETS?

SEA tracks U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while JETS tracks U.S. Global Jets Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.