SDS vs. XDSQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SDS (ProShares UltraShort S&P500) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SDS is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDS returned -20.88%/yr vs 9.68%/yr for XDSQ. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. SDS charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.

Performance

SDS vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDS achieves a -12.83% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 3.05% return.

SDS

• 1D: 2.84%
• 1M: 2.91%
• YTD: -12.83%
• 6M: -11.09%
• 1Y: -30.33%
• 3Y*: -27.00%
• 5Y*: -20.88%
• 10Y*: -27.73%

XDSQ

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 3.05%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: 14.47%
• 5Y*: 9.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDS vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500	-12.83%	-26.79%	-29.45%	-31.53%	30.69%	-34.33%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	3.05%	14.22%	23.12%	23.00%	-16.78%	13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between SDS and XDSQ is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	-0.94

The correlation between SDS and XDSQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDS vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDS	XDSQ
Financial Services	103.7%	10.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.1%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	7.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Technology	-	39.1%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

SDS vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDS

SDS Risk / Return Rank: 1
SDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
SDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SDS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SDS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 43
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDS vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDS	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.22	1.44	-2.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.85	1.99	-3.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.30	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	1.58	-2.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.65	7.51	-9.16

SDS vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDS Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDS and XDSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SDS vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDS and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDS	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.85%	-26.06%	-73.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.08%	-9.60%	-23.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.14%	-19.15%	-48.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.54%	-26.06%	-49.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.84%	-0.03%	-99.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.76%	-4.91%	-77.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.05%	2.01%	+18.04%

Volatility

SDS vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.62%. This indicates that SDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDS	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.60%	0.62%	+8.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.65%	8.09%	+11.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.92%	10.50%	+14.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.84%	15.28%	+18.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.85%	15.02%	+20.83%

SDS vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDS has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDS vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

SDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500	5.51%	5.88%	7.89%	5.77%	0.35%	0.00%	0.92%	1.84%	1.28%	0.09%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDS and XDSQ in my portfolio?

SDS and XDSQ have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDS or XDSQ?

SDS has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to XDSQ (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDS dropped -99.85% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.

Which ETF is better, SDS or XDSQ?

On 5-year performance, XDSQ leads with 9.68% vs -20.88% for SDS. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SDS or XDSQ?

Over the 5-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 9.68% return vs -20.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDS or XDSQ?

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for SDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDS or XDSQ?

SDS has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

What is the main difference between SDS and XDSQ?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for SDS and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.