PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDS vs. BCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDS vs. BCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and Barclays PLC (BCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDS achieves a -15.24% return, which is significantly lower than BCS's 8.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SDS has underperformed BCS with an annualized return of -27.93%, while BCS has yielded a comparatively higher 15.34% annualized return.


SDS

1D
0.66%
1M
0.07%
YTD
-15.24%
6M
-14.30%
1Y
-33.56%
3Y*
-27.68%
5Y*
-21.52%
10Y*
-27.93%

BCS

1D
3.72%
1M
14.52%
YTD
8.52%
6M
9.03%
1Y
58.38%
3Y*
59.68%
5Y*
27.21%
10Y*
15.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDS vs. BCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDS
ProShares UltraShort S&P500
-15.24%-26.79%-29.45%-31.53%30.69%-43.02%-49.91%-41.17%6.04%-32.02%
BCS
Barclays PLC
8.52%96.49%76.26%6.01%-21.90%31.71%-12.84%31.90%-29.25%0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SDS and BCS is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006

-0.60

The correlation between SDS and BCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.63 (1 year) to -0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDS vs. BCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDS
SDS Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDS Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

BCS
BCS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDS vs. BCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and Barclays PLC (BCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SDSBCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.32

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

2.24

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.68

6.33

-8.02

SDS vs. BCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDS Sharpe Ratio is -1.36, which is lower than the BCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDS and BCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SDS vs. BCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than BCS's maximum drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDS and BCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDSBCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.85%

-94.36%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.59%

-26.20%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.14%

-26.20%

-41.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.54%

-48.14%

-27.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.48%

-66.10%

-30.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.84%

-19.30%

-80.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.75%

-38.41%

-44.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.37%

9.25%

+12.12%

Volatility

SDS vs. BCS - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and Barclays PLC (BCS) have volatilities of 9.18% and 9.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDSBCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.18%

9.29%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.47%

24.22%

-4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.79%

29.47%

-4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.81%

34.05%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.91%

37.60%

-1.69%

Dividends

SDS vs. BCS - Dividend Comparison

SDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than BCS's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCS
Barclays PLC
1.71%1.70%3.13%4.86%4.18%1.61%3.91%3.68%3.21%1.37%2.26%2.95%
SDS
ProShares UltraShort S&P500
5.67%5.88%7.89%5.77%0.35%0.00%0.92%1.84%1.28%0.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDS and BCS have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCS has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to SDS (9.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDS dropped -99.85% vs BCS's -94.36%.

BCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDS and BCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer