SDS vs. SH
SDS (ProShares UltraShort S&P500) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - SDS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-200%), while SH is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDS returned -27.05%/yr vs -12.47%/yr for SH. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SDS charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SH.
Performance
SDS vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDS achieves a -15.25% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -6.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SDS has underperformed SH with an annualized return of -27.05%, while SH has yielded a comparatively higher -12.47% annualized return.
SDS
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- -13.26%
- YTD
- -15.25%
- 1Y
- -28.08%
- 3Y*
- -25.42%
- 5Y*
- -20.30%
- 10Y*
- -27.05%
- ALL TIME*
- -24.93%
SH
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- -5.73%
- YTD
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- -13.19%
- 3Y*
- -10.94%
- 5Y*
- -8.01%
- 10Y*
- -12.47%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $155.74M | $150.04M | $195.27M | |
| $271.72M | $244.09M | $301.56M |
SDS vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | -15.25% | -26.79% | -29.45% | -31.53% | 30.69% | -43.02% | -49.91% | -41.17% | 6.04% | -32.02% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -6.65% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDS and SH is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SDS and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
SDS vs. SH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDS
SH
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SDS
SH
Basic Materials
SDS
-
SH
-
Communication Services
SDS
-
SH
-
Consumer Cyclical
SDS
-
SH
-
Consumer Defensive
SDS
-
SH
-
Energy
SDS
-
SH
-
Healthcare
SDS
-
SH
-
Industrials
SDS
-
SH
-
Real Estate
SDS
-
SH
-
Technology
SDS
-
SH
-
Utilities
SDS
-
SH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDS vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
SDS
SH
SDS vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDS | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.86 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | -0.73 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | -1.30 | -0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDS vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than SH's maximum drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDS and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDS | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -94.66% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.56% | -16.06% | -14.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.14% | -38.82% | -29.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.54% | -44.53% | -31.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.08% | -74.80% | -21.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.84% | -94.54% | -5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.85% | -67.93% | -14.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.14% | 9.03% | +9.11% |
Volatility
SDS vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 3.51%. This indicates that SDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDS | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 3.51% | +3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.17% | 10.08% | +10.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.61% | 12.81% | +12.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.87% | 16.96% | +16.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.84% | 18.02% | +17.82% |
SDS vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDS has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDS vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
SDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than SH's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | 5.30% | 5.88% | 7.89% | 5.77% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 1.84% | 1.28% | 0.09% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.19% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SDS and SH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SDS has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to SH (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDS dropped -99.85% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.47% vs -27.05% for SDS. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.47% return vs -27.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for SDS.
SDS has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 4.19% for SH.
SDS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SH is Inverse Equities. SDS tracks S&P 500 Index (-200%), while SH tracks S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). Their fees differ too: 0.91% for SDS and 0.89% for SH.
SH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.92 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDS and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer