SDS vs. SPYM
SDS (ProShares UltraShort S&P500) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-200%), while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SDS returned -27.73%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for SPYM. At a correlation of -0.88, they often move in opposite directions. SDS charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
SDS vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDS achieves a -12.83% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 8.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SDS has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of -27.73%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
SDS
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- -12.83%
- 6M
- -11.09%
- 1Y
- -30.33%
- 3Y*
- -27.00%
- 5Y*
- -20.88%
- 10Y*
- -27.73%
SPYM
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
SDS vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | -12.83% | -26.79% | -29.45% | -31.53% | 30.69% | -43.02% | -49.91% | -41.17% | 6.04% | -32.02% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.21% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDS and SPYM is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006 | -0.88 |
The correlation between SDS and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from -1.00 (3 years) to -0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SDS vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDS
SPYM
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SDS
SPYM
Basic Materials
SDS
-
SPYM
Communication Services
SDS
-
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
SDS
-
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
SDS
-
SPYM
Energy
SDS
-
SPYM
Healthcare
SDS
-
SPYM
Industrials
SDS
-
SPYM
Real Estate
SDS
-
SPYM
Technology
SDS
-
SPYM
Utilities
SDS
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDS vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
SDS
SPYM
SDS vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDS | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.35 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 2.68 | -3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.65 | 11.98 | -13.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDS vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDS and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDS | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -54.46% | -45.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.08% | -8.90% | -24.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.14% | -18.72% | -49.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.54% | -24.48% | -51.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.48% | -33.87% | -62.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.84% | -3.14% | -96.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.76% | -7.14% | -75.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.05% | 1.99% | +18.06% |
Volatility
SDS vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 4.83%. This indicates that SDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDS | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | 4.83% | +4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.65% | 9.83% | +9.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.92% | 12.46% | +12.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.84% | 16.90% | +16.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.85% | 18.03% | +17.82% |
SDS vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDS has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDS vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
SDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than SPYM's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | 5.51% | 5.88% | 7.89% | 5.77% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 1.84% | 1.28% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.30% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDS and SPYM have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDS has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to SPYM (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDS dropped -99.85% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.61% vs -27.73% for SDS. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.61% return vs -27.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for SDS.
SDS has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 1.30% for SPYM.
SDS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. SDS tracks S&P 500 Index (-200%), while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for SDS and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDS and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer