SDS vs. COTG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SDS (ProShares UltraShort S&P500) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SDS is passively managed, while COTG is actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDS charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.

Performance

SDS vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDS achieves a -17.06% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 17.32% return.

SDS

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -8.86%
• YTD: -17.06%
• 6M: -16.53%
• 1Y: -34.59%
• 3Y*: -28.79%
• 5Y*: -21.98%
• 10Y*: -27.72%

COTG

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: -11.21%
• YTD: 17.32%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDS vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500	-17.06%	-4.83%
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	17.32%	-21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SDS and COTG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

SDS vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDS

SDS Risk / Return Rank: 0
SDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
SDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
SDS Omega Ratio Rank: 0
SDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SDS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDS vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDS	COTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.47	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.28	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.69	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDS	COTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.66	-0.28	-0.38

Drawdowns

SDS vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDS and COTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDS	COTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.85%	-25.69%	-74.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.85%	-23.48%	-76.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.73%	-8.35%	-74.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SDS	COTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.81%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.58%	40.65%	-17.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.64%	40.65%	-7.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.82%	40.65%	-4.83%

SDS vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDS has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDS vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

SDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, while COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500	5.79%	5.88%	7.89%	5.77%	0.35%	0.00%	0.92%	1.84%	1.28%	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDS and COTG in my portfolio?

SDS and COTG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SDS or COTG?

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDS or COTG?

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for SDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDS or COTG?

SDS has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.

What is the main difference between SDS and COTG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for SDS and 0.75% for COTG.