COTG vs. NBIG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG).

COTG and NBIG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COTG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Sep 18, 2025. NBIG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Oct 27, 2025.

Performance

COTG vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

COTG vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	29.14%	-16.01%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	9.01%	-62.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 29.14% return, which is significantly higher than NBIG's 9.01% return.

COTG

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: 29.14%
• 6M: 10.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIG

• 1D: -3.97%
• 1M: 10.38%
• YTD: 9.01%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTG vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COTG and NBIG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

COTG

Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

NBIG

Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF

Return for Risk

COTG vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COTG	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	-0.44	+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between COTG and NBIG is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

COTG vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither COTG nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

COTG vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -23.44%, smaller than the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	COTG	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.44%	-75.83%	+52.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.87%	-62.63%	+56.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.58%	-53.63%	+45.05%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COTG	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.49%	198.26%	-159.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.49%	198.26%	-159.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.49%	198.26%	-159.77%