PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COTG vs. RTXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COTG vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly lower than RTXG's 24.96% return.


COTG

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.88%
6M
-3.87%
YTD
12.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

RTXG

1D
0.90%
1M
15.56%
6M
5.40%
YTD
24.96%
1Y
63.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
83.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$653.21K$1.05M$1.51M
$945.29K$642.88K$633.54K

COTG vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COTG and RTXG is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COTG vs. RTXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RTXG
RTXG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
RTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COTG vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COTGRTXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

COTG vs. RTXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COTG vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -32.16%, smaller than the maximum RTXG drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and RTXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COTGRTXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.16%

-37.49%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.56%

-4.48%

-22.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.97%

-10.35%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.21%

Volatility

COTG vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COTGRTXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.99%

51.89%

-10.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.99%

51.21%

-10.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.99%

51.21%

-10.22%

COTG vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COTG and RTXG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

COTG vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison

COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COTG and RTXG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTG and RTXG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COTG and RTXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer