SDS vs. ARMG
SDS (ProShares UltraShort S&P500) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SDS is passively managed, while ARMG is actively managed. Over the past year, SDS returned -34.59% vs 510.84% for ARMG. At a correlation of -0.60, they often move in opposite directions. SDS charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
SDS vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDS achieves a -17.06% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 936.32% return.
SDS
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -8.86%
- YTD
- -17.06%
- 6M
- -16.53%
- 1Y
- -34.59%
- 3Y*
- -28.79%
- 5Y*
- -21.98%
- 10Y*
- -27.72%
ARMG
- 1D
- 4.85%
- 1M
- 261.28%
- YTD
- 936.32%
- 6M
- 526.62%
- 1Y
- 510.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDS vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | -17.06% | -27.93% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 936.32% | -61.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDS and ARMG is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | -0.60 |
The correlation between SDS and ARMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDS vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
SDS
ARMG
SDS vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDS | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | 3.96 | -5.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | 3.63 | -5.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.46 | -0.71 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 7.56 | -8.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | 13.34 | -15.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDS | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.47 | 3.96 | -5.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 1.24 | -1.90 |
Drawdowns
SDS vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDS and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDS | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -80.28% | -19.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.20% | -68.13% | +31.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.85% | 0.00% | -99.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.73% | -53.04% | -29.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.51% | 38.55% | -18.04% |
Volatility
SDS vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) is 5.59%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 64.57%. This indicates that SDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDS | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 64.57% | -58.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.81% | 103.90% | -86.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.58% | 130.31% | -106.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.64% | 138.30% | -104.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.82% | 138.30% | -102.48% |
SDS vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDS has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDS vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
SDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than ARMG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.47% | 4.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | 5.79% | 5.88% | 7.89% | 5.77% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 1.84% | 1.28% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDS and ARMG have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARMG has higher volatility (64.57%) compared to SDS (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDS dropped -99.85% vs ARMG's -80.28%.
On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 510.84% vs -34.59% for SDS. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SDS has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 510.84% return vs -34.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for SDS.
SDS has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 0.47% for ARMG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for SDS and 0.75% for ARMG.
ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDS and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer