SDOG vs. RIGS
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS).
SDOG and RIGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2012. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013.
Performance
SDOG vs. RIGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SDOG vs. RIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 8.31% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.28% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly higher than RIGS's 0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SDOG has outperformed RIGS with an annualized return of 9.35%, while RIGS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.30% annualized return.
SDOG
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SDOG vs. RIGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RIGS's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. RIGS — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
RIGS
SDOG vs. RIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDOG | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 0.37 | +0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 0.60 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.08 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 0.74 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.20 | 1.87 | +3.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDOG | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.37 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.29 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.43 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.45 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and RIGS is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SDOG vs. RIGS - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than RIGS's 4.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.53% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. RIGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than RIGS's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and RIGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -15.31% | -28.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -5.18% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -9.03% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | -15.31% | -28.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -2.15% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -1.60% | -3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.05% | +1.02% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. RIGS - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) at 2.20%. This indicates that SDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 2.20% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.43% | 6.17% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 10.15% | +5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 7.47% | +8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 7.74% | +11.34% |