RIGS vs. EIFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX).
RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. EIFAX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 16, 2008.
Performance
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.28% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund | -1.88% | 4.54% | 8.91% | 11.86% | -2.98% | 5.41% | 1.90% | 9.02% | 0.28% | 5.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than EIFAX's -1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed EIFAX with an annualized return of 3.30%, while EIFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.15% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
EIFAX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. EIFAX — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
EIFAX
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | EIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.82 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 1.20 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.25 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 1.22 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 3.93 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | EIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.82 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.50 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 1.16 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.17 | -0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and EIFAX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than EIFAX's 7.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund | 7.40% | 8.09% | 8.91% | 7.02% | 5.92% | 4.03% | 4.51% | 5.58% | 5.10% | 4.46% | 5.02% | 5.29% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and EIFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | EIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -40.28% | +24.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -2.45% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -7.63% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -24.22% | +8.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -2.18% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -2.28% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 0.79% | +1.26% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) at 0.85%. This indicates that RIGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | EIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 0.85% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 1.83% | +4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 3.31% | +6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 3.10% | +4.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 4.45% | +3.29% |