RIGS vs. EIFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX).
RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. EIFAX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 16, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RIGS or EIFAX.
Key characteristics
| RIGS | EIFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -1.31% | 2.07% |
| 1Y Return | 2.71% | 11.61% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.20% | 5.33% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.38% | 4.58% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.49% | 4.55% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.43 | 3.68 |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.21% | 3.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.31% | -38.15% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.74% | -0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and EIFAX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than EIFAX's 2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed EIFAX with an annualized return of 2.49%, while EIFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than EIFAX's 8.88% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 3.92% | 3.48% | 2.72% | 2.47% | 3.44% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% | 3.31% | 0.46% |
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund | 8.88% | 9.34% | 5.92% | 4.03% | 4.51% | 5.58% | 5.12% | 4.46% | 5.03% | 5.29% | 4.79% | 4.82% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -38.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and EIFAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RIGS vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) at 0.30%. This indicates that RIGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.