PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIGS vs. IYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIGS vs. IYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than IYLD's 5.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed IYLD with an annualized return of 3.18%, while IYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 4.02% annualized return.


RIGS

1D
0.05%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.03%
6M
0.87%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
3.18%

IYLD

1D
0.15%
1M
0.73%
YTD
5.17%
6M
5.67%
1Y
14.47%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
4.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIGS vs. IYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIGS
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
1.03%4.63%4.45%6.07%-5.72%1.93%3.58%7.60%-0.11%4.48%
IYLD
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF
5.17%15.44%2.00%12.55%-16.80%3.37%-1.18%15.82%-4.77%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RIGS and IYLD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between RIGS and IYLD has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIGS vs. IYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIGS
RIGS Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RIGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIGS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RIGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IYLD
IYLD Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIGS vs. IYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIGSIYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

2.54

-2.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.78

3.76

-2.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.49

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

3.11

-2.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.23

12.12

-9.89

RIGS vs. IYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the IYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIGS and IYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIGSIYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

2.54

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.45

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.42

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.50

-0.04

Drawdowns

RIGS vs. IYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum IYLD drawdown of -30.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and IYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIGSIYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-30.23%

+14.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.55%

-4.63%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.18%

-5.20%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.03%

-22.57%

+13.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.31%

-30.23%

+14.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-0.35%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-4.53%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.19%

+0.71%

Volatility

RIGS vs. IYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is 1.30%, while iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF (IYLD) has a volatility of 1.60%. This indicates that RIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIGSIYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.60%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

4.73%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.34%

5.72%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

7.86%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.75%

9.58%

-1.83%

RIGS vs. IYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than IYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIGS vs. IYLD - Dividend Comparison

RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, which matches IYLD's 4.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYLD
iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income ETF
4.60%4.72%5.32%5.76%5.45%3.47%4.38%5.25%5.78%4.22%4.84%5.26%
RIGS
RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
4.87%4.84%4.49%3.48%2.71%2.47%3.77%3.87%4.54%4.45%4.46%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIGS and IYLD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYLD has higher volatility (1.60%) compared to RIGS (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIGS dropped -15.31% vs IYLD's -30.23%.

On 10-year performance, IYLD leads with 4.02% vs 3.18% for RIGS. On fees, RIGS is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, RIGS has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYLD has performed better with a 4.02% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RIGS is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IYLD.

IYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 4.87% for RIGS.

RIGS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IYLD is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for RIGS and 0.60% for IYLD.

IYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIGS and IYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer