SDMF vs. EMTL
SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) and EMTL (SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDMF is a Systematic Trend fund tracking the DBi CTA Managed Futures Index, while EMTL is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by State Street. SDMF is passively managed, while EMTL is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. SDMF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EMTL.
Performance
SDMF vs. EMTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SDMF
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMTL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.04%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 3.35%
SDMF vs. EMTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 2.96% |
EMTL SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDMF and EMTL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDMF vs. EMTL — Risk / Return Rank
SDMF
EMTL
SDMF vs. EMTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDMF | EMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.74 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SDMF vs. EMTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDMF drawdown since its inception was -6.23%, smaller than the maximum EMTL drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMF and EMTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDMF | EMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -22.91% | +16.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.12% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -3.83% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.56% | — |
Volatility
SDMF vs. EMTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDMF | EMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.20% | 2.22% | +10.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 4.88% | +8.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 4.67% | +8.53% |
SDMF vs. EMTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDMF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EMTL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDMF vs. EMTL - Dividend Comparison
SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMTL SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF | 4.96% | 5.09% | 5.34% | 4.78% | 4.19% | 5.43% | 3.28% | 3.96% | 3.35% | 4.16% | 8.87% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDMF and EMTL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMTL.
EMTL has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.
SDMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while EMTL is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDMF and 0.65% for EMTL.
Find the right allocation for SDMF and EMTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer