PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDMF vs. EMTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDMF vs. EMTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SDMF

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.74%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMTL

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.94%
1Y
5.44%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
3.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDMF vs. EMTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SDMF and EMTL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDMF vs. EMTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDMF

EMTL
EMTL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EMTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMTL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EMTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMTL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDMF vs. EMTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SDMF vs. EMTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDMFEMTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.74

+0.07

Drawdowns

SDMF vs. EMTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDMF drawdown since its inception was -6.23%, smaller than the maximum EMTL drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMF and EMTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDMFEMTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-22.91%

+16.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.12%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-3.83%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

Volatility

SDMF vs. EMTL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDMFEMTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

2.22%

+10.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

4.88%

+8.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.20%

4.67%

+8.53%

SDMF vs. EMTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDMF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EMTL's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDMF vs. EMTL - Dividend Comparison

SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EMTL
SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
4.96%5.09%5.34%4.78%4.19%5.43%3.28%3.96%3.35%4.16%8.87%
SDMF
Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDMF and EMTL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMTL.

EMTL has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.

SDMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while EMTL is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDMF and 0.65% for EMTL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDMF and EMTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer