EMTL vs. EMLC
EMTL (SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF) and EMLC (VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. EMTL is actively managed, while EMLC is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMTL returned 3.30%/yr vs 2.22%/yr for EMLC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMTL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EMLC.
Performance
EMTL vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMTL achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than EMLC's 1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EMTL has outperformed EMLC with an annualized return of 3.30%, while EMLC has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.
EMTL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.64%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
EMLC
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.22%
EMTL vs. EMLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMTL SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF | 0.72% | 8.27% | 5.86% | 9.60% | -14.31% | 0.56% | 3.48% | 11.99% | -2.37% | 7.59% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 1.56% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 11.18% | -10.58% | -9.72% | 3.08% | 9.79% | -7.57% | 13.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMTL and EMLC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2016 | 0.41 |
The correlation between EMTL and EMLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMTL vs. EMLC — Risk / Return Rank
EMTL
EMLC
EMTL vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMTL | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.26 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.54 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.26 | 5.09 | +3.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMTL vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum EMLC drawdown of -32.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMTL and EMLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMTL | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -32.43% | +9.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.00% | -6.19% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.79% | -9.15% | +5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | -23.91% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.91% | -26.47% | +3.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -3.68% | +3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -14.33% | +10.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 1.87% | -1.31% |
Volatility
EMTL vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) is 0.66%, while VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) has a volatility of 2.26%. This indicates that EMTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMTL | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 2.26% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.69% | 6.28% | -4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25% | 7.15% | -4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.87% | 9.13% | -4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.67% | 10.03% | -5.36% |
EMTL vs. EMLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EMLC's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMTL vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison
EMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than EMLC's 6.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.15% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
EMTL SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF | 4.95% | 5.09% | 5.34% | 4.78% | 4.19% | 5.43% | 3.28% | 3.96% | 3.35% | 4.16% | 8.87% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMTL and EMLC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMLC has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to EMTL (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMTL dropped -22.91% vs EMLC's -32.43%.
On 10-year performance, EMTL leads with 3.30% vs 2.22% for EMLC. On fees, EMLC is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EMTL has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EMTL has performed better with a 3.30% return vs 2.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMLC is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMTL.
EMLC has the higher dividend yield at 6.15%, compared with 4.95% for EMTL.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EMTL and 0.30% for EMLC.
EMTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMTL and EMLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer