PortfoliosLab logo
EMTL vs. EMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EMTL and EMB is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EMTL vs. EMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EMTL:

2.34

EMB:

1.07

Sortino Ratio

EMTL:

3.31

EMB:

1.58

Omega Ratio

EMTL:

1.49

EMB:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

EMTL:

1.22

EMB:

0.70

Martin Ratio

EMTL:

9.98

EMB:

5.24

Ulcer Index

EMTL:

0.71%

EMB:

1.58%

Daily Std Dev

EMTL:

3.07%

EMB:

7.60%

Max Drawdown

EMTL:

-22.91%

EMB:

-34.70%

Current Drawdown

EMTL:

-0.05%

EMB:

-4.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMTL achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than EMB's 3.60% return.


EMTL

YTD

3.22%

1M

0.66%

6M

2.38%

1Y

7.11%

3Y*

4.64%

5Y*

2.27%

10Y*

N/A

EMB

YTD

3.60%

1M

1.16%

6M

1.29%

1Y

8.05%

3Y*

5.03%

5Y*

1.47%

10Y*

2.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMTL vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EMTL vs. EMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMTL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMTL is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMTL is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMTL is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMTL is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMTL is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMTL is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

EMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMB is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMB is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMB is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMB is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMB is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMB is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EMTL vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EMTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the EMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMTL and EMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EMTL vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison

EMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, less than EMB's 5.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EMTL
SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
5.29%5.34%4.79%4.19%5.43%3.28%3.96%3.35%4.16%8.86%0.00%0.00%
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.53%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%4.56%

Drawdowns

EMTL vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum EMB drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMTL and EMB.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EMTL vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) is 0.65%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that EMTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...