SDG vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SDG (iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDG is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Sustainable Development Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. SDG is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

SDG vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF (SDG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDG achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

SDG

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -2.75%
• 6M: 3.08%
• YTD: 4.47%
• 1Y: 15.38%
• 3Y*: 4.55%
• 5Y*: -0.48%
• 10Y*: 7.90%

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDG vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SDG iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF	4.47%	0.53%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SDG and POW is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

SDG vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDG

SDG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
SDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
SDG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
SDG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDG vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF (SDG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDG	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.94	—	—

Drawdowns

SDG vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDG drawdown since its inception was -30.35%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDG and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDG	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.35%	-18.37%	-11.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.53%	-18.37%	+12.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.60%	-4.33%	-5.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SDG	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.96%	32.94%	-17.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.81%	32.94%	-17.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.60%	32.94%	-16.34%

SDG vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDG vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

SDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SDG iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF	1.73%	2.00%	1.95%	1.77%	1.82%	1.66%	0.97%	1.39%	2.47%	2.54%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDG and POW in my portfolio?

SDG and POW have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SDG or POW?

On fees, SDG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDG or POW?

SDG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDG or POW?

SDG has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between SDG and POW?

SDG is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SDG and 0.75% for POW.