SDG vs. EFG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF (SDG) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG).
SDG and EFG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SDG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Sustainable Impact Index. It was launched on Apr 20, 2016. EFG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 1, 2005. Both SDG and EFG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SDG or EFG.
Performance
SDG vs. EFG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDG achieves a -6.26% return, which is significantly lower than EFG's 2.44% return.
SDG
-6.26%
-6.72%
-3.88%
0.09%
5.62%
N/A
EFG
2.44%
-4.66%
-4.19%
8.66%
4.66%
5.30%
Key characteristics
| SDG | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.04 | 0.63 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.16 | 0.98 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.02 | 1.12 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.03 | 0.54 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.13 | 2.60 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.92% | 3.50% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.19% | 14.41% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.20% | -58.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -20.87% | -9.73% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SDG vs. EFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EFG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between SDG and EFG is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SDG vs. EFG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF (SDG) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SDG vs. EFG - Dividend Comparison
SDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than EFG's 1.57% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDG iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF | 2.07% | 1.77% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 0.97% | 1.39% | 2.47% | 2.54% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFG iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF | 1.57% | 1.63% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 0.85% | 1.69% | 1.98% | 1.56% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.34% | 1.86% |
Drawdowns
SDG vs. EFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDG drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum EFG drawdown of -58.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDG and EFG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SDG vs. EFG - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF (SDG) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) at 3.96%. This indicates that SDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.