SDG vs. ICLN
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF (SDG) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN).
SDG and ICLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SDG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Sustainable Impact Index. It was launched on Apr 20, 2016. ICLN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both SDG and ICLN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SDG or ICLN.
Correlation
The correlation between SDG and ICLN is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SDG vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SDG:
-0.38
ICLN:
-0.90
SDG:
-0.42
ICLN:
-1.19
SDG:
0.95
ICLN:
0.86
SDG:
-0.25
ICLN:
-0.31
SDG:
-0.99
ICLN:
-1.64
SDG:
5.94%
ICLN:
13.05%
SDG:
15.39%
ICLN:
23.70%
SDG:
-29.20%
ICLN:
-87.15%
SDG:
-23.44%
ICLN:
-69.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDG achieves a -9.31% return, which is significantly higher than ICLN's -24.80% return.
SDG
-9.31%
-3.25%
-3.51%
-7.24%
3.85%
N/A
ICLN
-24.80%
-3.70%
-16.37%
-23.82%
0.96%
3.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SDG vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SDG vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF (SDG) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SDG vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
SDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than ICLN's 1.82% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDG iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF | 1.93% | 1.77% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 0.97% | 1.39% | 2.47% | 2.54% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.82% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% | 2.83% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
SDG vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDG drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDG and ICLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SDG vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Impact ETF (SDG) is 4.79%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that SDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.