SDEM vs. STXE
SDEM (Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - SDEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend while STXE tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SDEM returned 18.54%/yr vs 23.32%/yr for STXE. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SDEM charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.
Performance
SDEM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 31.48% return.
SDEM
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 28.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.94%
STXE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- YTD
- 31.48%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $101.46K | $99.85K | $114.98K | |
| $412.67K | $566.81K | $571.67K |
SDEM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 13.99% | 32.01% | 4.02% | 4.25% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 31.48% | 34.23% | 2.09% | 12.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDEM and STXE is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between SDEM and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
SDEM vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SDEM
STXE
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
SDEM
STXE
Industrials
SDEM
STXE
Real Estate
SDEM
STXE
Utilities
SDEM
STXE
Consumer Cyclical
SDEM
STXE
Communication Services
SDEM
STXE
Consumer Defensive
SDEM
STXE
Basic Materials
SDEM
STXE
Energy
SDEM
STXE
Technology
SDEM
STXE
Healthcare
SDEM
STXE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDEM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank
SDEM
STXE
SDEM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SDEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 2.73 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.60 | 10.29 | -0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SDEM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and STXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.38% | -20.38% | -27.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -20.38% | +11.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.34% | -20.38% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -14.59% | +13.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.46% | -3.95% | -16.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 5.39% | -2.36% |
Volatility
SDEM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) is 3.94%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that SDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDEM | STXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 13.05% | -9.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 28.09% | -16.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 29.83% | -15.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 20.17% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 20.17% | -1.12% |
SDEM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDEM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison
SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than STXE's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 4.91% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 7.50% | 8.86% | 8.14% | 6.30% | 6.47% | 6.55% | 5.01% | 5.06% | 6.14% |
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 1.91% | 2.66% | 3.22% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDEM and STXE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STXE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to SDEM (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs STXE's -20.38%.
On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 23.32% vs 18.54% for SDEM. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, SDEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 23.32% return vs 18.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.
SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 1.91% for STXE.
SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.32% for STXE.
SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDEM and STXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer