SDEM vs. QQQI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SDEM (Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. SDEM is passively managed, while QQQI is actively managed. Over the past year, SDEM returned 28.12% vs 25.86% for QQQI. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDEM charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

SDEM vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 10.58% return.

SDEM

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 11.17%
• 6M: 12.41%
• 1Y: 28.12%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: 4.51%
• 10Y*: 5.26%

QQQI

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 10.58%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDEM vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	11.17%	32.01%	3.38%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.58%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SDEM and QQQI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.42

The correlation between SDEM and QQQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SDEM vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDEM	QQQI
Financial Services	25.9%	0.3%
Industrials	11.5%	3.3%
Utilities	7.1%	1.5%
Communication Services	5.7%	15.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	7.7%
Real Estate	5.2%	0.1%
Basic Materials	3.9%	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	12.1%
Energy	3.5%	0.7%
Technology	2.6%	53.3%
Healthcare	1.8%	4.3%

Return for Risk

SDEM vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDEM

SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 69
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 64

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 65
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDEM vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDEM	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.84	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	2.43	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.34	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	2.70	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	11.63	-1.35

SDEM vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDEM and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SDEM vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDEM	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.38%	-20.00%	-27.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	-9.61%	+0.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.49%	-2.69%	-0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.66%	-2.21%	-18.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	2.23%	+0.51%

Volatility

SDEM vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) is 4.90%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that SDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDEM	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	6.10%	-1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.48%	11.35%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.91%	14.10%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	17.34%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.22%	17.34%	+1.88%

SDEM vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDEM vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than QQQI's 13.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.53%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	4.99%	5.27%	7.28%	7.50%	8.86%	8.14%	6.30%	6.47%	6.55%	5.01%	5.06%	6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDEM and QQQI in my portfolio?

SDEM and QQQI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDEM or QQQI?

QQQI has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to SDEM (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, SDEM or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, SDEM leads with 28.12% vs 25.86% for QQQI. On fees, SDEM is cheaper at 0.67% per year. On volatility, SDEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SDEM or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, SDEM has performed better with a 28.12% return vs 25.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDEM or QQQI?

SDEM is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDEM or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.53%, compared with 4.99% for SDEM.

What is the main difference between SDEM and QQQI?

SDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.